Magnetic Field using Ampere's Law

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application and understanding of Ampere's Circuital Law and Biot-Savart Law in calculating magnetic fields, particularly focusing on the differences in approach for long versus short wires. Participants explore theoretical implications, practical applications, and the selection of loops for Ampere's Law.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about the theoretical basis of Ampere's Circuital Law and the criteria for selecting the appropriate loop for calculations.
  • One participant mentions using Biot-Savart Law as an alternative for calculating the magnetic field due to a short wire, providing a specific formula involving angles.
  • Another participant suggests that there is no overwhelming reason to choose a particular closed loop path in air, recommending a path that simplifies the integral.
  • There is a discussion about the equivalence of Ampere's Law and Biot-Savart Law in magnetostatics, with some arguing that the choice of law depends on the geometry of the problem.
  • Concerns are raised about the appropriateness of terminology used to describe Ampere's Law, with a participant suggesting that calling it "fishy" is misleading.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the clarity and applicability of Ampere's Circuital Law versus Biot-Savart Law, indicating multiple competing views on the best approach for different scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations are noted regarding the selection of loops in Ampere's Law and the conditions under which each law is most effectively applied, but these remain unresolved.

Hijaz Aslam
Messages
66
Reaction score
1
I find Ampere's Circuital Law sort of fishy. I don't understand what the actual theory proposes. And the loop that should be taken into consideration adds much to the confusion. How should we select the loop?

And in the case of a long wire we find the magnetic field around it by applying ##B.2\pi r= \mu_o i_{enc}##. So how do we find the magnetic field due to a short wire (which is not long or infinitely long)?
Using Biot Savart Law we find the magnetic field due to a short wire as ##\mu_o/4\pi r (cos\theta_1-cos\theta_2)##
where ##cos\theta_1## and ##cos\theta_2## are the angles between the length vector (towards the direction of current) and the position vector at the extreme ends.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes, using Biot-Savart Law is a way to go here. About integration procedures for particular examples ask in math calculus section.
 
Hijaz Aslam said:
I find Ampere's Circuital Law sort of fishy. I don't understand what the actual theory proposes. And the loop that should be taken into consideration adds much to the confusion. How should we select the loop?

Fishy ?

As a kid did you never tinker with iron filings and a battery?

Ampere allows one to put a number on this phenomenon...
ironfilingsaroundwire.jpg

http://coe.kean.edu/~afonarev/Physics/Magnetism/Magnetic Fields and Forces-eL.htm

There's no overwhelming reason to chose any particular closed loop path in air
so i'd pick one that makes for a not-very-cumbersome integral

but in solving a practical problem like a transformer ,,

Two%20solenoids,%20B-field_5H15.40_JPG.jpg

https://sharepoint.umich.edu/lsa/physics/demolab/SitePages/5H15.40 - Projection of the Magnetic Field Due to a Current in a Solenoid.aspx

you'd probably find it handy to pick a path through the middle (or centroid) of its iron core.

I guess using a clamp-on ammeter sort of made it intuitive for me...

http://www.sears.com/craftsman-digital-clamp-on-ammeter/p-03482369000P
http://c.shld.net/rpx/i/s/i/spin/image/spin_prod_1113787012?hei=444&wid=444&op_sharpen=1
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: I_am_learning
But I would like to know, why do we obtain the answer for a particular case (here, the magnetic field due to a long wire) using Ampere's Law. I mean if we are asked to find the magnetic field due to a short wire how do we do it? (I heard that Ampere's Law is the general rule for finding the magnetic field than the Biot-Savart Law)?
 
To call Ampere's law "fishy" is a very bad choice of words. Ampere's Law and Biot-Savart Law are equivivalent in magnetostatics (meaning one can be derived from another). Which one do you choose to use depends on the problem's geometry. In your example of finitely long straight wire, Biot-Savart Law is more convinient to use.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K