- #71
sweet springs
- 1,223
- 75
Born2bwire, Thanks for your quick and detailed answer. also to you, sophiecentaur.
Let me confirm my understanding of what you say.
Do the two types of the equivalent large loop currents, i.e.
A adding up of atomic loop currents of a magnet
B net loop current in a superconducting ( or zero resistance ) circuit
behave differently under a magnetic field, i.e.
A keep accelerated
B stop accelerated after all the current kinetic energy are transferred to the whole body kinetic energy
?
----------------------------
Regards.
Let me confirm my understanding of what you say.
----------------------------Born2bwire said:Since these currents are from the atomic orbitals, there is no need to keep supplying energy because the orbitals are stable themselves. On a very basic level, if we have an electron orbiting in a circle, we do not need to expend any energy to keep it orbiting, only a constant force. However, when we ourselves physically move the magnets around a magnetic field, we are inputting and taking out energy from these orbitals. That is, if I pull two magnets apart, I impart work that gets injected back into the magnetic fields. This would correspond to adding energy into the electron orbits.
Do the two types of the equivalent large loop currents, i.e.
A adding up of atomic loop currents of a magnet
B net loop current in a superconducting ( or zero resistance ) circuit
behave differently under a magnetic field, i.e.
A keep accelerated
B stop accelerated after all the current kinetic energy are transferred to the whole body kinetic energy
?
----------------------------
Regards.
Last edited: