Magnetostatics: Explaining Jackson's Derivation from 5.20 to 5.21

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shehry1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jackson
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the transition from equation 5.20 to 5.21 in Jackson's treatment of magnetostatics, specifically the derivation of the curl of B in terms of current density. The key technique employed is integration by parts, utilizing the vector identity \(\mathbf{A} \cdot (\mathbf{\nabla}f)=\mathbf{\nabla} \cdot (f \mathbf{A})-f(\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot \mathbf{A})\) with \(f=\frac{1}{|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}'|}\) and \(\mathbf{A}=\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x})\). The term \(\int \mathbf{\nabla}' \cdot \frac{\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x}')}{|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}'|} d^3x'\) is transformed into a surface integral via the divergence theorem, resulting in the elimination of the first term as the boundary at \(x' \to \infty\) yields a zero integrand, thus confirming equation 5.21.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, particularly integration by parts.
  • Familiarity with Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" and its equations.
  • Knowledge of the divergence theorem and its applications in electromagnetism.
  • Concept of magnetic fields and current density in magnetostatics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the divergence theorem in electromagnetism.
  • Review vector identities used in electromagnetism, particularly in Jackson's text.
  • Explore the implications of the curl of B in magnetostatics.
  • Examine examples of integration by parts in physics problems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators seeking to clarify complex derivations in Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics".

shehry1
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Can anyone explain to me how Jackson goes from equation 5.20 to 5.21 (Magnetostatics - Derivation of the curl of B in terms of the current density).

He says that he's used integration by parts but I can't see how he got rid of the first term (the one that involves integrals only) when integrating by parts.

Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like he uses the vector identity [tex]\mathbf{A} \cdot (\mathbf{\nabla}f)=\mathbf{\nabla} \cdot (f \mathbf{A})-f(\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot \mathbf{A})[/tex] with [tex]f=\frac{1}{|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}'|}[/tex] and [tex]\mathbf{A}=\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x}')[/tex]

The [tex]\int \mathbf{\nabla}' \cdot \frac{\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x}')}{|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}'|} d^3x'[/tex] term can be transformed to a surface integral using the divergence theorem, and since the boundary of all space is at [tex]x' \to \infty[/tex] the integrand of that term is zero leaving you with equation 5.21
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K