Magnetostatics: Explaining Jackson's Derivation from 5.20 to 5.21

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shehry1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jackson
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 3K views
shehry1
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Can anyone explain to me how Jackson goes from equation 5.20 to 5.21 (Magnetostatics - Derivation of the curl of B in terms of the current density).

He says that he's used integration by parts but I can't see how he got rid of the first term (the one that involves integrals only) when integrating by parts.

Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like he uses the vector identity [tex]\mathbf{A} \cdot (\mathbf{\nabla}f)=\mathbf{\nabla} \cdot (f \mathbf{A})-f(\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot \mathbf{A})[/tex] with [tex]f=\frac{1}{|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}'|}[/tex] and [tex]\mathbf{A}=\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x}')[/tex]

The [tex]\int \mathbf{\nabla}' \cdot \frac{\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x}')}{|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}'|} d^3x'[/tex] term can be transformed to a surface integral using the divergence theorem, and since the boundary of all space is at [tex]x' \to \infty[/tex] the integrand of that term is zero leaving you with equation 5.21