Magnetostatics force equation for continuous current density

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the derivation of magnetostatic force equations for continuous current densities, as presented in Jackson's work. Key equations include the vector potential, magnetostatic force, and torque, which relate to the magnetic dipole moment and external magnetic fields. A critical point of contention is the interpretation of the continuum force equation, which integrates forces over all space rather than at a single point, raising questions about its physical meaning. The conversation emphasizes that while this approach may seem unusual, it is reasonable for localized currents, contrasting it with the complexities introduced by point particles in electrodynamics. Overall, the discussion highlights the nuances of applying classical electromagnetic principles to continuous distributions of current and magnetic moments.
Peeter
Messages
303
Reaction score
3
In Jackson, the following equations for the vector potential, magnetostatic force and torque are derived##\mathbf{m} = \frac{1}{{2}} \int \mathbf{x}' \times \mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x}') d^3 x'##

##\mathbf{A} = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \frac{\mathbf{m} \times \mathbf{x}}{\left\lvert {\mathbf{x}} \right\rvert^3}##

##\mathbf{F} = \boldsymbol{\nabla}( \mathbf{m} \cdot \mathbf{B} ),##

##\mathbf{N} = \mathbf{m} \times \mathbf{B},##

where $$\mathbf{B}$$ is an applied external magnetic field and $$\mathbf{m}$$ is the magnetic dipole for the current in question.

These all follow from an analysis of localized current densities $$\mathbf{J}$$, evaluated far enough away from the current sources. I worked through the vector potential results, and made sense of his derivation (lots of sneaky tricks are required). I've also done the same for the force and torque derivations. While I now understand the mathematical steps he uses, there's a detail about the starting point of his derivation, where he writes

##\mathbf{F} = \int \mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x}) \times \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{x}) d^3 x##

This is clearly the continuum generalization of the point particle Lorentz force equation, which for zero electric field is

##\mathbf{F} = q \mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B}##

For the point particle, this is the force on the particle when it is in the external magnetic field. i.e. this is the force at the position of the particle.

However, for the continuum Force equation, it integrates over all space. How can we have a force that is applied to all space, as opposed to a force applied at a single point, or across a surface?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the answer is you are computing the total forces on all currents and/or all magnetic moments and these currents and magnetic moments are distributed over all space.
 
Charles Link said:
I think the answer is you are computing the total forces on all currents and/or all magnetic moments and these currents and magnetic moments are distributed over all space.

That seems a bit strange in general, but in the special case of localized currents seems like a reasonable thing to calculate.
 
It's not strange. To the contrary, what's strange and in fact makes a lot of trouble, are point particles in electrodynamics. They are the strangers in a continuum theory. This becomes clear from the fact that a single-point charge's charge and current density are given by (in relativistic notation)
$$j^{\mu}(x)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \mathrm{d} \tau q \frac{\mathrm{d} y^{\mu}(\tau)}{\mathrm{d} \tau} \delta^{(4)}[x-\vec{y}(\tau)].$$
The "force law" follows from Noether's theorem applied to the Lagrangian of interacting charge-current distributions.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top