Magnitude of avg acc. of train moving in a circle?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the average acceleration of a train moving in a circular path. The train travels at 65 cm/s on a track with a radius of 20 cm, moving from tree A to tree B, which is 1/4 of the way around the track. The average acceleration is determined to be 190 cm/s², despite initial confusion about whether it should be zero. Participants clarify that the average acceleration considers both the change in direction and magnitude of velocity, and the correct time calculation is crucial for the solution. A more straightforward method to find time involves using the distance of 1/4 of the circle divided by the train's speed.
gmichel395
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"Assume that a train is traveling at 65 cm/s, and the track has radius 20cm. What is the magnitude of the train's average acceleration as the train goes from the tree marked A to the next tree B, located exactly 1/4 of the way around the track from tree A? [Hint: This question is not asking for the train's centripetal acceleration.]"

Homework Equations


Equations of motion of object moving in circle, using ω,∝, θ.
aavg=(vf-vi)/Δt

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer is given to be 190 cm/s2 but why wouldn't it be zero? Maybe I'm misunderstanding the question, but if it doesn't want centripetal acceleration, it must mean tangential acceleration. And I thought that only the direction of tangential velocity changes, not magnitude. I also included a picture.
20160326_130018.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider that velocity is a vector. Make a sketch showing the two velocity vectors of interest.
 
If the answer would be zero, the average acceleration would be zero, so initial and final velocity would be the same.

The answer is not the centripetal acceleration directly (and you don't have to calculate it), but this acceleration does contribute to the answer.
 
Would vi=<0,65> and vf=<65,0>?
 

Attachments

  • 20160326_194742[1].jpg
    20160326_194742[1].jpg
    16.4 KB · Views: 370
gmichel395 said:
Would vi=<0,65> and vf=<65,0>?
Yes, those are two candidates for vi and vf (the particular vectors depend upon what you choose as the orientation of the track in your frame of reference). They will work for determining the average acceleration over the interval.
 
So if I subtract vi from vf, I get <65,-65>. To find time I used the formula acentripetal=v2/r=ω2r, and solved for ω by plugging in 65 cm/s as v and 20 cm as r and found ω to be 3.25rad/s. I converted this to rev/s and multiplied by 1/.25rev (since 1/4 the way around track) and got time to be 2.07s. Did I go wrong somewhere?
 
gmichel395 said:
So if I subtract vi from vf, I get <65,-65>. To find time I used the formula acentripetal=v2/r=ω2r, and solved for ω by plugging in 65 cm/s as v and 20 cm as r and found ω to be 3.25rad/s. I converted this to rev/s and multiplied by 1/.25rev (since 1/4 the way around track) and got time to be 2.07s. Did I go wrong somewhere?

Your time is incorrect. You really went the long way around to try to calculate it.

Your angular velocity ω looks good. What is the angular distance of a quarter circle? Distance over velocity yields time...
 
  • Like
Likes gmichel395
Ah, θ=90°=1.57rad. t=Δθ/ω. t=.48s. Then √(652+652) divided by .48s gives the 190cm/s2. Thank you!
 
Note that you do not need ω. You can calculate the length of 1/4 of a circle with radius 20 cm, and divide that by the speed of the train. It gives the same result in a more direct way.
 
Back
Top