Magnitude of current in photoelelctric effect

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that the magnitude of the current generated in the photoelectric effect is primarily influenced by the intensity of the light, which relates to the number of photons per second, rather than the frequency of the photons. While higher frequency photons provide more kinetic energy to electrons, the current itself is defined by the number of electrons emitted, not their speed. Increasing light intensity results in more photons, leading to more electrons being ejected and thus a higher current. However, at a constant energy flux, higher frequency photons can actually result in a lower current due to fewer photons being present. Ultimately, the relationship between light intensity and current is crucial for understanding the photoelectric effect.
ENgez
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
I have been thaught that the magintude of the current generated by photons fired at a metal is unrelated to the frequency of the photons but to the photon beam's srength (photons/sec).

I know from the governing equation: E_{\gamma}=\phi+E_{k_{e^{-}}} that the frequency of the photons determines the amount of kinetic energy given to an electron, and that the kinetic energy grows (the free electron moves faster) as the photon's frequency grows.

The definition of current is electrons/sec through a given cross-section.
that means that the current can grow when:

a) there are more free electrons, achieved by firing more photons (increasing the beams strength)

b) making the electrons faster, by increasing the frequency of the photons.

so the photon's frequency does influence the magnitude of the current. Where am i wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're not mistaken directly, but I would advise you to take a look at this:
http://rugth30.phys.rug.nl/quantummechanics/photoelectric.htm"
Observe that:
The light intensity affects the number of photons and therefore the magnitude of the photoelectric current, but does not affect the cut-off voltage V0...
Does that elucidate matters?
Daniel
 
Last edited by a moderator:
well, not exactly, I understand why the light intensity doesn't effect cut off voltage. It is becuase light intensity is measured by the number of photons/sec but their individual energy is dependent only on the frequency.

but this still doesn't explain why the magnitude of the voltage cannot be influenced by the frequency. After all, faster electrons will cross faster, hence more current.
 
ENgez said:
After all, faster electrons will cross faster, hence more current.
Nope.
Current = number of electrons per second.
Speed of those electrons have no influence on the current.
Like with transportation: people flow is proportional to number of buses leaving the station per hour. It doesn't matter how fast those buses drive on motorway then.
 
I think i got it. The current in the metal is caused by the electron "holes" left behind by the electrons knocked off the metal. therefore it does not matter how fast the electrons the electrons are flying out, what matters is the number of holes.

more light intenstiy = more photons = more electrons knocked off = more "holes" = more current.

Correct?
 
Yes.
You just must remember, that 'light intensity' is not a strictly defined term. You may mean it as 'number of photons per second' - then the current is proportional to the intensity.
Or you may understand it as 'energy transmitted per second'. And in this meaning, number of photons (and thus current) is proportional to number of 'intensity', but also reverse proportional to the frequency of photons.

So - what may sounds paradoxically to you - at the same energy flux, if the photons have higher frequency, the photolectric current is lower.
 
Last edited:
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top