Magnitude of radial component of jerk along line of centres

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the magnitude of the radial component of jerk between two gravitating bodies, leading to the expression 2G(m1+m2)r(dot)/r3. The user begins with the acceleration equation and combines the effects on both bodies to establish a relationship for jerk. They express concern about the assumptions made during the derivation, particularly regarding the time dependency of the scalar r in the denominator. The user seeks guidance on whether their approach is correct or if they should consider a different method. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of understanding the dynamics of gravitational interactions in relation to jerk.
tim_from_oz
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the component of the jerk along the line of centres of two gravitating bodies has magnitude 2G(m1+m2)r(dot)/r3.

Homework Equations



(Eq. 1) r(double dot) = - G(m1+m2)r(hat)/r2 (acceleration of body 2 relative to body 1)

The Attempt at a Solution



Sorry for the (dots) and (hats), not sure how to put them on here.

Since I am only after the magnitude of the jerk radially between the two masses, and for each body this is equal to or opposite to Eq. 1, they can essentially be added, giving:

(Eq. 2) r(double dot) = 2G(m1+m2)r(hat)/r2

r(hat) is the unit vector, so this can be broken down into r(vector)/|r|, thus giving:

(Eq. 3) r(double dot) = 2G(m1+m2)r(vector)/r3

Finally, taking the derivative of the acceleration to get the jerk gives:

(Eq. 4) r(triple dot) = 2G(m1+m2)r(dot)/r3

This seems to have been too simple for me, so I think I've probably made some incorrect assumptions. I'm just looking for some guidance on whether I went down the right track or whether I should be heading down a different one.

This is an assessed problem, so just some guidance in the right direction would be appreciated as opposed to full solutions, etc.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tim_from_oz said:
Finally, taking the derivative of the acceleration to get the jerk gives:

(Eq. 4) r(triple dot) = 2G(m1+m2)r(dot)/r3
Is the scalar r in the denominator not also a function of time?
(I feel that replacing the ##\hat r## with ##\frac{\vec r}{r}## was not helpful.)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top