Magnitude of the electric field at equator (measured in kV)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the magnitude of the electric field at the equator of the Earth, specifically in kilovolts per meter (kVm^-2). Participants explore various sources of information, formulas, and calculations related to the electric field, including its relationship to solar flux and the Earth's charge distribution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants mention the solar flux at the equator as 1.5 kWm^-2 but question its relevance to calculating the electric field.
  • There are claims that the electric field at the equator is approximately 1.06 kVm^-1, but participants express skepticism about this figure and its implications.
  • One participant suggests that a field of 1 kV/m would influence the ionosphere, potentially creating layers of positive and negative ions.
  • Another participant provides a range of 100 to 150 V/m for the electric field at the Earth's surface, attributing it to the Earth's negative charge and the ionosphere's positive charge.
  • References to various sources and literature are made, including a book titled "The Light Fantastic," which lists the electric field value but does not explain the calculation method.
  • Participants discuss the need for proper references and calculations, with one suggesting the use of a formula for average energy density related to electric fields.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the magnitude of the electric field at the equator, with multiple competing views and uncertainties regarding the calculations and sources cited.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the calculation methods for the electric field values mentioned, and participants note the dependence on definitions and assumptions related to electric fields and solar energy.

Petra de Ruyter
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Hi there

Only known variables include the solar flux on the Earths atmosphere at the equator is 1.5 kWm^ -2.

I've calculated the total energy from the Sun as 4 x 10^26 W, but can't seem to get to a calc of the mag of electric field at equator (measured in kVm^-2).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Petra de Ruyter said:
Hi there

Only known variables include the solar flux on the Earths atmosphere at the equator is 1.5 kWm^ -2.

I've calculated the total energy from the Sun as 4 x 10^26 W, but can't seem to get to a calc of the mag of electric field at equator (measured in kVm^-2).

I don't think you are going down the right path

the 1.5 kW m2 is the amount of sunlight which isn't going to help much in calculating the natural electric field of the Earth

have a look here for some ideas …..

https://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Electric+Field+of+the+Earth ( and there are many other links on google)
Dave
 
Is there a formula? A few websites state that it is 1.06 kVm^-1, however they do not say how it is calculated.
 
Petra de Ruyter said:
Is there a formula? A few websites state that it is 1.06 kVm^-1, however they do not say how it is calculated.
Which website? That figure suggests that we would all be electrocuted just by standing up!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
sophiecentaur said:
suggests that we would all be electrocuted just by standing up!
You're sure? Positive? Absolutely certain? :oldsurprised::olduhh::oldsurprised: :wink::wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
Bystander said:
You're sure? Positive? Absolutely certain? :oldsurprised::olduhh::oldsurprised: :wink::wink:
Not necessarily - the source resistance would be very high and our bodies would conduct any unbalanced charge and the potential at our head would be the potential of the nearby ground. However, I think there would have to be consequences which aren't so easily explained away.
But a field of 1kV/m would affect the ionosphere such that the + and - ions would form two layers, top and bottom of a layer, I think. Wouldn't that have been measured?
I'll wait until there's a proper reference about the idea.
 
Petra de Ruyter said:
1.06 kVm^-1
 
Petra de Ruyter said:
Is there a formula? A few websites state that it is 1.06 kVm^-1, however they do not say how it is calculated.

I don't know where you found that number. At the surface of the Earth there is an electric field of 100 to 150 V/m, due to the fact that the Earth has a negative charge, and the ionosphere a positive charge.
See this link for example: http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_09.html
 
  • #10
Greetings the source is in the book "The Light Fantastic: A modern introduction to Classical and Quantum Optics.

The answer to the question is listed as 1.06 kVm^-1 but does not state how this is calculated, I need some guidance as to how this figure was reached?
 
  • #11
Petra de Ruyter said:
how this figure was reached?
Direct measurement; 1940 s to 50 s? Thereabouts. Try the stacks in the library.
 
  • #12
Petra de Ruyter said:
Greetings the source is in the book "The Light Fantastic: A modern introduction to Classical and Quantum Optics.

The answer to the question is listed as 1.06 kVm^-1 but does not state how this is calculated, I need some guidance as to how this figure was reached?
I think you are to use the formula given for the average energy density of a plane wave. (1.20)
N = \frac {\epsilon_{0}E^2c}{2} where N is the average energy density and E the amplitude of the electric field of the wave.
Of course the light is incoherent, and the amplitude and direction of the field should vary randomly. Calculating an RMS value should come out the same. I don't think you have to prove that for the first exercise of the first chapter.
 
  • #13
Greetings

Many thanks willem2. In my book it is (1.19). I appreciate all your help on this. I won't be doing this unit yet, but I wanted to get a head start on it.

cheers
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
537
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
980
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K