Main sequence lifetime problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter kranav
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lifetime Sequence
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of the most massive main sequence stars in a globular cluster after 1 billion years, given that the main sequence lifetime of a solar mass star is 10 billion years and scales with mass as M^-2. Participants clarify that the total mass of the cluster is irrelevant for this calculation. The correct approach involves setting up a ratio that accounts for the relationship between lifetime and mass, specifically T proportional to M^-2. The initial setup of T/t = M/m is acknowledged as incorrect, as it should reflect the inverse square relationship. The final answer indicates that the most massive stars remaining after 1 billion years have a mass of 3.2 times that of the sun.
kranav
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hello.
The question states that
We have a globular cluster with total mass 10^6 times sun's mass.
Assume that the main sequence lifetime of a solar mass star is 10 giga year, and a main sequence lifetime scales with mass as M^-2. What is the mass of the most massive main sequence stars in the cluster after 1 giga year? (answer - 3.2 times sun's mass)

we have t ~ M^-2

Does this require me to do a differential and find out the maxima (of the mass) by putting it to zero?
or by cutting of the massive stars which would die out within the 1 giga year and somehow see the masses left.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
1) Hint 1: The cluster mass is extraneous information that you can ignore...

(stop reading before you get to hint 2)2) Hint 2: set it up like a ratio problem.
 
so,

T/t = M/m

where t = 10 gy and T = 1 gy and
m = 1 solar mass

is this correct?

thanks.
 
kranav said:
so,

T/t = M/m

where t = 10 gy and T = 1 gy and
m = 1 solar mass

Close. What you've set up is the equation for T proportional to M. You are looking for T proportional to M**-2
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top