Make an operator to be hermitian

masoodsa
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have an operator which isnot Hermitian is there any way to make it hermitian ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
add its hermitian conjugate and redefine it.
 
Any operator can be written of the form H = A + iB where A and B are Hermitian.

In fact one could base QM on any operator using that result via the obvious extension to the Born Rule E(H) = E(A) + i E(B)

Interestingly in proving the Born rule via Gleason that's what one does.

So why does one stick with Hermitan operators? The reason is the properties of continuous transformations between states and symmetry. Wigners Theroem implies such must be Unitary:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigner's_theorem

If U is such a transformation dependant on t (not necessarily time) and we consider Δt small. U(Δt) = 1 + D Δt. UU(bar) = 1 + DΔt + D(bar)Δt = 1 or D = -D(bar) which means D is pure imaginary. If we want to associate D with an observation, which from symmetry considerations you want to do because it leads to the same equations as classical physics (see Ballentine chapter 3), then its expectation would be imaginary as well which would be a rather strange thing. So what we do is define divide D by i and use that operator which is of course real.

Thanks
Bill
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top