Schools Making sense of college class numbers?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding college math course numbering and credit systems. Participants highlight that course numbers vary significantly between institutions, making it difficult to compare classes like Math 101 and Math 110, which may appear similar but have different focuses. The importance of consulting faculty advisors or school catalogs for accurate course descriptions is emphasized, as many students struggle to understand the implications of course numbers and credit hours. There is frustration expressed over the lack of clarity when students ask for advice on course selection without providing specific course details. Additionally, the discussion touches on the perception of difficulty in courses, noting that higher course numbers do not necessarily indicate more advanced material, as seen in examples like Math 55, which is known for its difficulty despite its lower number. Overall, the conversation underscores the need for clear communication regarding course content and structure in academic settings.
Tyrion101
Messages
166
Reaction score
2
For instance, math 101 is beginning algebra, math 102 is intermediate, 103 is a reasoning course, 109 and 110 are both college algebra, but 109 comes with "modeling" and either are fine but one is preferred over the other. I just want math out of the way, and 109 is the only thing that fits my schedule, they both seem like the same sort of class, but I'll ask you people of there is much of a difference when one is "preferred" over the other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Unless some PFs attend your particular university, we won't know what math 101 or math 10 whatever is. Different schools assign different numbers to classes; sometimes they assign none at all. If you want to figure out your schedule, sit down with your faculty advisor or get a catalog of your schools classes. You know what your major is and (I hope) what classes you are required to take.
 
I was mystified by the 'system' when I first started college, too! Like SteamKing said, the numbers mean nothing. (For example, google "Math 55". Only 55? Should be easy, right :devil:?)

Btw, it's kind of frustrating when folks who don't know better write here asking, What should I take to best prepare me for analysis: Math 152, or Applied Math 174? With no course descriptions, how are we supposed to know?!

Even more mystifying is the credit system. If first-year French is 5 credits, how can upper-level E&M be only 3 credits?
 
lisab said:
Even more mystifying is the credit system. If first-year French is 5 credits, how can upper-level E&M be only 3 credits?

I have no doubt first year French is more difficilt. Upper level EM is just tiny little details about the same 4 equations you learn in lower level EM :p
 
So apparently the difference is that 110 is more science based, which is a shame because none of the classes meet my schedule.
 
Numbering systems don't always mean a lot. Higher numbers do not always correlate to a higher level class.

For instance, the Calculus sequence at my school is Math 203, 204, and 205, with Intro Differential Equations being Math 211. Elementary Statistics is Math 240. This is a very basic Stats class that is algebra based. It's at a community college, and would transfer to most 4-year schools as a GenEd Math 100 type course. I've encountered people that seem to be under the impression that they're in a harder math class than me though, because they're in Math 240, and I'm 'only' in Math 203.

Without seeing the descriptions, it's hard to really tell what a course is like.

As Lisab mentioned, Math 55 is an infamously difficult class, and is highly regarded as being one of the most difficult undergraduate math classes in the country. Yet it's only Math 55, so it should be easy, right?
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
Back
Top