Making the final decision: Bucknell v. F & M v. Rutgers v. Grinnell

  • Thread starter Thread starter dr.manhattan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decision Final
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around choosing between several institutions for a double major in Physics and Mathematics. The individual has been accepted into a Mathematical Scholars Program at Bucknell, while also considering Rutgers, which is the most affordable option due to financial aid. Grinnell offers a competitive financial package, making it only slightly more expensive than Rutgers. There are concerns about the feasibility of double majoring, but many contributors agree that it should not pose significant issues for serious students, especially if the courses overlap. For those pursuing a PhD, graduate programs typically cover tuition and provide stipends, alleviating concerns about the cost of further education. Rutgers is noted for having a strong Physics department, ranking within the top 30 nationally.
dr.manhattan
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
If anyone has advice as to which of these institutions I should enroll at please inform me!

Some things to consider:

I got into a Mathematical Scholars Program at Bucknell (note: I plan on majoring in both Physics and Mathematics. sidenote: A professor at Rutgers told me not to do this. Does anyone have an opinion on this topic?)

I received approximately half tuition in the form of scholarships and financial aid to ALL of these four schools. (Obviously, that still makes some options more financially favorable over others. In this instance, Rutgers is the most affordable.)

Exception to the above: I received a very generous offer from Grinnell. With their offer, it would only cost approximately $5,000 more per year than Rutgers.


I only make such a big deal about the cost because I plan on going to graduate school and it seems to make more sense to spend more then. (I want to be a college professor/ researcher :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dr.manhattan said:
If anyone has advice as to which of these institutions I should enroll at please inform me!

Some things to consider:

I got into a Mathematical Scholars Program at Bucknell (note: I plan on majoring in both Physics and Mathematics. sidenote: A professor at Rutgers told me not to do this. Does anyone have an opinion on this topic?)

I received approximately half tuition in the form of scholarships and financial aid to ALL of these four schools. (Obviously, that still makes some options more financially favorable over others. In this instance, Rutgers is the most affordable.)

Exception to the above: I received a very generous offer from Grinnell. With their offer, it would only cost approximately $5,000 more per year than Rutgers.


I only make such a big deal about the cost because I plan on going to graduate school and it seems to make more sense to spend more then. (I want to be a college professor/ researcher :)

I don't think double majoring in math and physics is a very big issue for most serious physics students. If you plan to pursue a PhD down the road you'll probably end up taking calc/linear algebra/ode/complex analysis/modern algebra and maybe pde as an undergrad. Unless you have a school where some of those courses can't count towards a math major because they're used under the physics major you should almost naturally be a double major or earn a minor. In any event, as long as you have a strong preparation in maths a double major really won't be a decisive factor (except maybe if you decide to look for a job).

With respect to the cost of graduate school, if you plan on pursuing a PhD in Physics (or Maths or Astronomy) then you'll most likely be looking at admission to programs which cover your tuition+benefits+a living stipend that usually is part of a teaching or research assistant position. Despite the griping, PhD students in Physics generally get a nice deal in that sense.

I don't know much about the physics departments at some of the schools you mentioned but Rutgers has a fairly strong department (something like a top 30 dept. according to many rankings).
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top