Man this problem makes no sense (intensities)

  • Thread starter Thread starter purduegrad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intensities
AI Thread Summary
A 10^4 kg spaceship with a perfectly reflecting mirror is accelerated by a laser beam at 0.3% of Earth's gravity, prompting a discussion on calculating the power of the laser. A perfectly reflecting mirror doubles the momentum transferred from the light to the spaceship, as opposed to a perfectly absorbing surface, which only transfers momentum once. The force exerted on the spaceship can be calculated using the formula F = ma, where the acceleration is derived from the laser's intensity. The pressure exerted by the electromagnetic wave on the reflecting surface is given by P = 2|S|/c, linking power and momentum. Understanding these principles allows for the determination of the laser beam's power needed for the specified acceleration.
purduegrad
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
a 10^4 kg spaceship with a perfectly reflecting mirror is pushed by a laser beam with an accel of .3% g ( Earth's gravity). what is the power of the laser beam? [note:intensity*A = power]


not sure what the perfectly reflecting means...but maybe someonce can help...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
depending on if a surface is reflecting or absorbing. light will inpart a different amount of momentum to the surface. It's a pretty straight forward problem. You do have to read the book some.

JMD
 
By perfectly reflecting, the mirror causes twice the momentum of the light to be added to the spaceship. If it were perfectly absorbing, only 1x the momentum would be added.

Force = dp/dt = ma

Njorl
 
Here are some hints: Find the force exerted on the spaceship. Consider that light has momentum and energy. (What's the relationship between energy and momentum for light?) What is the change in momentum of the light when it reflects off the mirror? (Impulse = Ft)

A perfectly reflecting mirror reflects back all the incident light. No energy is lost. (The power of the reflected beam equals the power of the incident beam.)
 
Perfectly reflecting means that the ship doesn't absorb any of the energy of the beam, so the beam is reflected retaining all of its energy, & the ship ends up with twice as much momentum as the beam had.

I'll give you some pieces. See if you can put them together.

You have enough info to determine the force acting on the ship just using F=ma.

Now remember that pressure P = F/A (here, A is area)

The magnitude of the Poynting vector of an em wave is
|S| = (du/dt)/A (note that du/dt is power, S is the Poynting vector)

The last thing you need to know is that the pressure exerted by an em wave on a perfectly reflecting surface is
P = 2|S|/c (c being the speed of light)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top