Management Of Birth When Mother Has Low Platelets

  • Thread starter Thread starter lisab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Management
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the management of childbirth in cases where the mother has low platelet counts, specifically at 38 weeks of pregnancy. It is established that a Cesarean section may be preferred to minimize trauma and control bleeding risks associated with thrombocytopenia. The controlled environment of an operating room allows for better hemostasis through techniques such as clamping and electrocautery, compared to the unpredictable nature of vaginal delivery. The conversation highlights the importance of surgical intervention in preventing severe complications during childbirth.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thrombocytopenia and its implications during pregnancy
  • Knowledge of Cesarean section procedures and indications
  • Familiarity with hemostasis techniques such as clamping and electrocautery
  • Awareness of potential complications during labor and delivery
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the management of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy
  • Learn about the risks and benefits of Cesarean sections in high-risk pregnancies
  • Study hemostatic techniques used in surgical settings
  • Explore patient advocacy and communication strategies during labor
USEFUL FOR

Obstetricians, midwives, healthcare providers involved in maternal-fetal medicine, and expectant parents facing complications related to low platelet counts during pregnancy.

lisab
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,033
Reaction score
612
A good friend of mine's wife is at 38 weeks in her first pregnancy. Her platelet count has been decreasing steadily in the last few weeks. Her midwife said it's not critical but it is now at a level that is a concern, and it raises the chance of Cesarean section.

Why would a Cesarean be a better choice in this situation? It seems if a patient has low platelets you'd want to minimize trauma to reduce the chance of bleeding. I know there can be significant trauma during birth, but abdominal surgery is pretty darn traumatic, too.

Is it because the trauma of a vaginal birth is somewhat uncontrolled?

Or is it to better control the separation of the placenta from the uterus?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Considering how normal my pregnancy was and then the unexpected complications during labor and the amount of hemorrhaging and blood loss I had during labor, it is a real concern. They kept trying to put those large absorbent surgical pads under me but the blood was just flowing off of them and running off the bed and pooling onto the floor. It was quite bad. They had stacks of towels. It looked liked a massacre. And this was still during the mid stages of labor. My husband was so upset he put his fist through the wall. I don't think they knew what they were doing. It was my first pregnancy, I didn't know what was normal, it was a private delivery room, so there was no one else in there to say something was terribly wrong. My doctor was on vacation and her back up was no where to be found. We just kept hearing the nurses whispering "blood", "can't find her doctor". But they kept telling us everything was ok, except it turned out nothing was ok. Good thing I was in a hospital or I probably would have lost my daughter.
 
Last edited:
Did you have dropping platelets as you approached full term?

I've know several women who have had experiences like yours. No surprise surviving birth was quite uncertain before modern medicine. Good health and fitness guaranteed nothing.
 
lisab said:
Is it because the trauma of a vaginal birth is somewhat uncontrolled?

This.

We can and do often take people to the OR with thrombocytopenia. Because in a controlled setting when you are dissecting tissue planes, it is easy to clamp, apply pressure, bovie (electrocautery) or suture your way to hemostasis.

In traumatic bleeding you have an uncontrolled situation where it is hard to get hemostasis and often requires opening someone up to find out what is bleeding anyway. So better to just have the surgical intervention in the first place.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cbrons and lisab
bobze said:
This.

We can and do often take people to the OR with thrombocytopenia. Because in a controlled setting when you are dissecting tissue planes, it is easy to clamp, apply pressure, bovie (electrocautery) or suture your way to hemostasis.

In traumatic bleeding you have an uncontrolled situation where it is hard to get hemostasis and often requires opening someone up to find out what is bleeding anyway. So better to just have the surgical intervention in the first place.

Thanks - that makes sense.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K