Solving Summations: Tips & Tricks for Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter CMBR
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body System
CMBR
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See the attachment, I am stuck as to how the summation sign \sum_{b\neq a}^{} in (2.1.1) ends up as \sum_{ab}^{} in the term with the red dot above (2.1.5).

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



As I understand you end up taking the product of two summations such that \sum_{a}^{}(\sum_{b\neq a}^{})=\sum_{ab}^{}, but I don't really understand the logic here.

just trying to understand, thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • Help.png
    Help.png
    35.3 KB · Views: 517
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a subindex ##a## missing from what should be ##\dot{\bf r}_a## from equation 2.1.4 and subsequently in ##\ddot{\bf r}_a## in 2.1.5. The rest is just inserting 2.1.1.
 
yeh I got that but once you insert 2.1.1 i don't get how the summation in front of the red dot term is \sum_{ab}^{} once you sub 2.1.1 you get \sum_{a}^{}(\sum_{b\neq a}^{}), I don't really understand how that works
 
Last edited:
You are making a sum of sums. It may help to write the sums out for a small number of particles, let us say 3:
$$
\sum_{a} \sum_{b\neq a} F_{ab} = (F_{12} + F_ {13}) + [F_{21} + F_{23}] + \{F_{31} + F_{21}\}
$$
where the term in () is the term originating from the sum over ##b \neq 1## for ##a = 1##, [] for ##a = 2##, and {} for ##a = 3##. Now ##\sum_{ab}## is a bit of a bastard notation. If assuming that we by this mean ##\sum_{a=1}^3 \sum_{b=1}^3##, then we get some additional terms ##F_{11} + F_{22} + F_{33}##, but the particles do not exert forces onto themselves so these can be taken to be zero.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Yeh I sort of came to a similar conclusion myself, the issue was that I didn't get why you can use the notation \sum_{ab}^{} if you neglect particle self interactions, the notation in that case is not strictly true then? Wouldn't it be better to keep it in the form \sum_{a}^{}(\sum_{b\neq a}^{}), anyway thanks for the clarifications!
 
Last edited:
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top