Is there a difference between Many Worlds Interpretation and Relational QM?

  • Thread starter Thread starter the_pulp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Many worlds Qm
the_pulp
Messages
206
Reaction score
9
Whats the difference between Many Worlds Interpretation and Relational QM. Here is what I understand in few words:

MWI: The whole universe system evolves with Schrodinger Equation without Quantum Collapse, but when a subsystem interacts with other subsystem, it seems like Quantum Collapse.

RQM: Every measurement of a system by another system is like an interaction of the second system over the first one. So it breaks the quantum evolution and so happens quantum collapse.

These ideas seem identical to me. Do you know if there is any diference between these two approaches.

Ps: I am concerned with this two interpretation because I think I am a Many World or a Relational "fan".
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
I understand that the world of interpretations of quantum mechanics is very complex, as experimental data hasn't completely falsified the main deterministic interpretations (such as Everett), vs non-deterministc ones, however, I read in online sources that Objective Collapse theories are being increasingly challenged. Does this mean that deterministic interpretations are more likely to be true? I always understood that the "collapse" or "measurement problem" was how we phrased the fact that...
Back
Top