Mass & Emittance: Does Heat Affect Mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ABHoT
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between mass, emittance, and heat. It posits that while mass can be reduced by emittance, heating an object does not necessarily lead to a quicker reduction in mass. Instead, heating increases energy emission, which can affect mass differently depending on the state of the object. The conversation highlights that mass is influenced by energy content, particularly thermal energy, until thermal equilibrium is reached. Overall, the complexities of mass and energy interactions are emphasized, particularly in relation to thermal emissions.
ABHoT
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Is mass reduced by emittance?
If so if you heat an object would its mass reduce quicker?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
ABHoT said:
Is mass reduced by emittance?

Yes.

If so if you heat an object would its mass reduce quicker?

No. It will either reduce slower or increase.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the answer.
I think I'm missing something:

If you heat an object energy emission increases.
Mass is reduced by emmitance.
Heating an object increases its mass.

Am I mis-understanding what mass is?

If all matter/mass gives off radiation/electromagnetic waves and emmitance reduces mass does that mean that all mass in the universe is slowly turning into energy?
 
ABHoT said:
Thanks for the answer.
I think I'm missing something:

If you heat an object energy emission increases.
Mass is reduced by emmitance.
Heating an object increases its mass.

Ok, it depends are you referring to the mass before heating, or after. We are talking about thermal emissions. Object will cease to radiate energy when it reaches thermal equilibrium with its surroundings. So, if your question was "is energy content contributing to the mass content?", answer is yes. But if you omit radioactive processes, which require special conditions (temperature, pressure, or high atomic number for spontaneous decay), object can radiate only its 'energy content' (thermal energy, chemical bonds energy).
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top