Mass Flow at the Mid-Plane in a closed container

  • Thread starter c.teixeira
  • Start date
42
0
Hi there.

I am designing a type cilindrical can full of a fluid, with a temperature difference between the top and bottom. Now, after the simulation of the free convection phenomenom in COMSOL, I wanted to understand the effect of varying the temperatures, to the "fluid movement" (fluid flow/convection) that occurs within the can. To do so, I calculated the mass flow in the transverse plane ( the mid-plane[at the same distance from the top and bottom]): [itex]\dot{m}[/itex] = [itex]\int\int\rho*w*dA[/itex].

The results I got for the mass flow were = 0. As there is no mass sink or source within the can, the mass flow had indeed to be zero unless it was compressing part of the liquid, and "creating" vaccum in another part of the can. So basically, the amount of mass that flows trough the mid-plane to the top is equal to the mass that flows trough the mid-plane to the bottom. However, what is relevant for my work, is to understand "how much liquid movement" occurs in the can. In order to do so, what do you think would be the most suitable surface integration I could use?
I tough about evaluating the following surface integral: [itex]\dot{m}[/itex] = [itex]\int\int\rho*\sqrt{w^{2}}*dA[/itex].
In this case, the fluid crossing the plane of integration in direction to the bottom( with negative w) would count as positive mass flow. do you think this is a reasonable solution? do you have any sugestions?

Here is a sketch to make it more clear:
PF_sketch.png


Best regards,

c.teixeira
 
19,472
3,897
Your method should work just fine. Just divide by 2 to get the up flow and the down flow.
 

Related Threads for: Mass Flow at the Mid-Plane in a closed container

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
963

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Top