Mass Flow through a 1.5 Pipe @ 300kpa

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the choke point for mass flow through a 1.5" pipe at 300 kPa and 383 K. The original poster is struggling with calculations using an online tool, yielding an unexpectedly low mass flow rate. Participants suggest that additional information is needed, particularly regarding whether the flow is adiabatic or isothermal, which affects the velocity of the gas. It is emphasized that a pressure differential is necessary for flow to occur, as equal pressures (P1 = P2) would result in no flow. Understanding the sonic velocity under the given conditions is crucial for accurate calculations.
NateP
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Mass Flow through a 1.5" Pipe @ 300kpa

Hi,

I'm having some trouble with finding the "choke" point of a 1.5" diameter pipe.

Conditions:
300 kPa
383 deg K
1.5 in D

I've tried using this little guy, http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/mflchk.html, with the Mach = 1, and only get ~1.5lb/min, which can't be correct. Can't figure out what I'm missing?

Thanks
Nate
 
Physics news on Phys.org


NateP said:
Hi,

I'm having some trouble with finding the "choke" point of a 1.5" diameter pipe.

Conditions:
300 kPa
383 deg K
1.5 in D

I've tried using this little guy, http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/airplane/mflchk.html, with the Mach = 1, and only get ~1.5lb/min, which can't be correct. Can't figure out what I'm missing?

Thanks
Nate

You need more information...take a look here and try again:

http://www.chem.mtu.edu/~crowl/cm4310/Chapter4b.pdf

CS
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Thanks for the link,

P1 = P2 in my case, but having trouble understanding if this would fall under Adiabatic or Isothermal, but I take it has something to do with the velocity of the gas?

It looks like I need to start with finding the sonic velocity under the given conditions. Looking at the formula:

a = γ gcRgT /M

Which translates into:
Code:
Sq rt of ( Gamma * Grav constant * Ideal Gas Constant * Temp  / Molecular weight

Do any of these variables change under the given conditions? I can only seem to reference values at 20 deg C and 101 kPa...
 


NateP said:
Thanks for the link,

P1 = P2 in my case, but having trouble understanding if this would fall under Adiabatic or Isothermal, but I take it has something to do with the velocity of the gas?

It looks like I need to start with finding the sonic velocity under the given conditions. Looking at the formula:

a = γ gcRgT /M

Which translates into:
Code:
Sq rt of ( Gamma * Grav constant * Ideal Gas Constant * Temp  / Molecular weight

Do any of these variables change under the given conditions? I can only seem to reference values at 20 deg C and 101 kPa...

It's up to you to determine how you want to model the system. If the process is rapid, then the adiabatic assumption is valid. If the temperature of the gas is constant, the isothermal would be best. In reality it's somewhere in between the two.

In compressible flow the density of the gas typically changes by an appreciable amount. However, the 'gamma' term should capture that effect. Obviously the terms labeled 'constant' won't change, hence the name. The molecular weight won't change either. The temp was previously discussed as well as gamma.

CS
 


NateP said:
Thanks for the link,

P1 = P2 in my case, but having trouble understanding if this would fall under Adiabatic or Isothermal, but I take it has something to do with the velocity of the gas?
...

If P1 = P2 then no flow will occur. There must be a pressure differential in a horizontal pipe for fluid flow.

CS
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top