Mass needed for static equilibrium compound pulley system

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the mass required for static equilibrium in a compound pulley system, given a specific mass (m2 = 60 kg). The focus is on understanding the mechanics involved, particularly through the use of free body diagrams and the relationship between the movements of the masses in the system.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states the need to find the mass (m1) for static equilibrium with m2 = 60 kg.
  • Another participant emphasizes that in a static situation, the lengths of the rope will not change and suggests using free body diagrams and tensions to analyze the system.
  • A third participant reiterates the importance of free body diagrams and tensions, expressing gratitude for the advice.
  • A later reply introduces the idea of how the movement of one mass affects the other, questioning whether the movement is equal, half, or double, and suggests this relationship can help deduce the necessary tension for balance.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of analyzing the system through free body diagrams and the concept of static equilibrium, but there is no consensus on the specific approach to determining the mass m1.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps required to find m1, and assumptions about the relationships between the movements of the masses remain unaddressed.

hus8765
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For what m1 will the illustrated pulley system be in static equilibrium if m2 = 60 kg?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


im supposed to use the change in lengths but don't know how to do it
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-03-05 at 14.52.56.png
    Screen Shot 2015-03-05 at 14.52.56.png
    12.1 KB · Views: 877
Physics news on Phys.org
If it is static (no motion) then the lengths will not be changing. Look to free body diagrams and tensions instead.
 
gneill said:
If it is static (no motion) then the lengths will not be changing. Look to free body diagrams and tensions instead.
thanks a lot
 
Hello hus, welcome to PF :smile:

The change in length thingy is a good hint, though. But perhaps a little differently: If one of the two moves a little, does the other move just as much, half as much, or twice as much ? From that you can deduce the proper tension force to keep balance. And balance means no change of lengths allright.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
Replies
25
Views
9K