Colour & Mass: Does It Impact Weight?

alchemist
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
if there's two identical object of the same mass and same composition but is of two different colours, would one weigh heavier than the other?? assuming that the coating of paint that gives the object its colour is of the same density for each colour and that same volume of each colour is used to colour the objects..
will the difference in mass due be to the amount of anergy absorbed through the different colours?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The objects would not have different masses due to their colors alone.

If you shine a light on the objects, and one of them gets hotter than the other due to its greater absorption of the light, then yes, the hot would would be slightly more massive, due to its larger internal energy.

If you keep both objects at the same temperature, however, there will be no difference in their masses.

- Warren
 
Originally posted by alchemist
if there's two identical object of the same mass and same composition but is of two different colours

If they are identical, have the same mass and the same composition, how could they be of different color?
 


Originally posted by 1100f
If they are identical, have the same mass and the same composition, how could they be of different color?

alchemist said, in his first post: " assuming that the coating of paint that gives the object its colour is of the same density for each colour and that same volume of each colour is used to colour the objects."

In other words, each object is identical except for a thin coat of paint.

The question does make sense but the answer is, of course, that color will have absolutely no effect on the mass.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but since
M = V \times D,
if V_{color1} = V_{color2} and D_{color1} = D_{color2}, won't the masses be the same?
 
If seems to me that the question is about the frequency/energy/mass of photons, is it?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top