Mass of Jupiter using as Many moons as Possible

AI Thread Summary
Kepler's law can be used to calculate the mass of Jupiter by considering its moons, but modifying the law for more than a binary system may not yield significant improvements in accuracy due to the minimal impact of additional moons. For greater precision, various analytic methods exist, and the resonance between Jupiter's largest moons—Io, Europa, and Ganymede—should be factored in, as they influence each other's orbits. The resonant interactions help maintain their orbital paths, which could affect calculations of Jupiter's mass. While using just one moon can provide a good estimate, incorporating the resonant dynamics of multiple moons may refine the results further. Ultimately, the choice of method and desired accuracy will dictate the approach taken.
walkera
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
To calculate the mass of a binary system, one can use keplers law. P^2= (4*(pi)^2*a^3)/(G*(m1+m2)) To get a more accurate mass I must take into account as many moons as possibe for jupiter. Is it possible to change kepler's law alittle to make it accommodate more than a binary system?

ty
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums walkera!

First, I'm not sure why you'd want to tinker with Kepler's law for Jupiter (or the solar system, or anything in the solar system except Pluto/Charon and Earth/Moon ... the deviation caused by the other moons will be extremely small.

Second, if you do want to get greater accuracy, there are many different methods. From your post it seems you are interested in analytic methods (different formulae) rather than digital ones (e.g. a digital orrery, or a simulation on a PC); there are whole shelves in libraries devoted to various approximations and methods (look up 'celestial mechanics').

Perhaps you could consider the level of accuracy you want? Or the number of pages of formulae you could tolerate?
 
Using any 1 moon is going to get you a very good answer. But if you want to venture further to the right of the decimal point, you have to consider that Io, Europa and Ganymede are locked in resonance with each other. I believe it's 1:2:3 or 1:2:4. And Callisto, spiraling outward will eventually get locked into resonance as well.

If all were instantly converted to massless particles, they'd continue to orbit as-is for a little while but soon would diverge from their real paths as the resonant forces would cease to exist. With the resonance, when anyone of them moves too fast or too slow to keep the resonance, subtle forces from the other 2 shepard them back into place which will have a small effect when trying to compute Jupiter's mass from their periods.

At least I think that's what's going on :shy:
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top