Mass-spring system in SHM concept question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a mass-spring system problem in simple harmonic motion (SHM) using conservation of energy principles. The user calculates kinetic energy (KE) and potential energy (PE) at various points, ultimately arriving at a ratio of PE to KE. A key point emphasized is the importance of determining the total energy of the system, which remains constant over time. The conversation highlights the relationship between potential energy, kinetic energy, and the spring's extension, guiding the user towards a clearer understanding of the problem. The final conclusion suggests that the ratio of energies can be simplified to 15/16, contingent on proper calculations and understanding of energy conservation.
freshcoast
Messages
185
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


1raq6x.jpg



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Well since spring is in SHM, only conservative forces are at play here. So using conservation of energy, the kinetic energy would be the change in potential energy. Which I have set up as

KE = 1/2k(A^2)2 - 1/2k(A/4)2

after some algebra, combining like terms with common denominators I am left with,

KE = (15/32)kA2

now when I take the fraction of the two, PE/KE of

(15/32)kA2 / 1/2mv2

I get (15/16)kA2/mvf2

So I'm thinking my answer would be 15/16

I don't know whether to just ignore the variables since there was no value in them or I find a way to relate them since I was given a frequency?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
freshcoast said:

Homework Statement


1raq6x.jpg

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Well since spring is in SHM, only conservative forces are at play here. So using conservation of energy, the kinetic energy would be the change in potential energy. Which I have set up as

KE = 1/2k(A^2)2 - 1/2k(A/4)2

after some algebra, combining like terms with common denominators I am left with,

KE = (15/32)kA2

So far so good. :approve:

now when I take the fraction of the two, PE/KE of

(15/32)kA2 / 1/2mv2

I get (15/16)kA2/mvf2

Sorry but I'm not following you there. :rolleyes:

What's the total energy of the system? Once you find that you can find the ratio of kinetic energy over total energy.

So I'm thinking my answer would be 15/16

It might be 15/16. But if so, you haven't quite shown why yet.

I don't know whether to just ignore the variables since there was no value in them or I find a way to relate them since I was given a frequency?

Hint: your next step is to find the total energy of the system.

[Edit: Another hint: the total energy of the system is conserved, and doesn't change with time. :wink:]
 
Last edited:
The reason this is a "conceptual" problem, as opposed to a "calculation" problem is that you can use the fact that the potential energy of a spring is proportional to the extension or compression of the spring to quickly find the ratio. When the mass is at distance A from the equilibrium all of the energy is potential, when it is distance 0 from equilibrium, none of it is. when it is at distance A/4 from equilbrium (and so 3A/4 from greatest extension) what fraction of the energy is potential energy? What fraction is kinetic?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh I think I've figured it out. The total energy of the system can either be when x is at it's max "A", or when the velocity is at it's max = v_max. So I need an equation for the kinetic energy, which I set up as

1/2mvf^2 = 1/2kA^2, which gives me the Vfinal I can use to substitute into the kinetic energy equation above which allows me to take the ratio, and everything being canceled out I am just left with 15/16
 
HallsofIvy said:
[...] the potential energy of a spring is proportional to the extension or compression of the spring [...]

I think you mean the potential energy is proportional to the square of the extension or compression. :smile:

freshcoast said:
Oh I think I've figured it out. The total energy of the system can either be when x is at it's max "A", or when the velocity is at it's max = v_max. So I need an equation for the kinetic energy, which I set up as

1/2mvf^2 = 1/2kA^2, which gives me the Vfinal I can use to substitute into the kinetic energy equation above which allows me to take the ratio, and everything being canceled out I am just left with 15/16

I am not familiar with whatever you are doing with the "1/2mvf^2." :rolleyes: Maybe you mean \frac{1}{2}m(v_{max})^2?.

But yes, the potential energy of the system is \frac{1}{2}kA^2 when the extension is equal to A. You can use that (and a hints from HallsofIvy and myself [my previous post]) to determine the total energy of the system. :wink:

In other words, you could solve for v_{max} and substitute things around. But it's not necessary to even bring v_{max} into the problem. If you know what the potential energy is at maximum extension, then you also know the total system energy.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top