Massive Scalar Field in 2+1 Dimensions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the analogue of the electric field equation in 2+1 dimensions, specifically E = - ∫ (d²k)/(2π)² (1/(k² + m²)) e^(i k · (x₁ - x₂)). The transformation to polar coordinates leads to E = - (1/(2π)²) ∫₀^∞ dk ∫₀²π dθ (k/(k² + m²)) e^(i k r cos(θ)). The integral over θ results in the Bessel function of the first kind, yielding E = - (1/2π) ∫₀^∞ dk (k/(k² + m²)) J₀(kr). The discussion highlights the importance of proper definitions of Bessel functions and suggests consulting Abramowitz & Stegun for clarification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric field equations in theoretical physics
  • Familiarity with Bessel functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of contour integration techniques
  • Proficiency in transforming integrals to polar coordinates
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of Bessel functions, particularly J₀
  • Learn about contour integration methods in complex analysis
  • Explore the derivation of electric field equations in various dimensions
  • Review integral transformations and their implications in physics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in physics, and anyone interested in advanced mathematical techniques in field theory.

xGAME-OVERx
Messages
86
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



We wish to find, in 2+1 dimensions, the analogue of E = - \frac{1}{4\pi r} e^{-mr} found in 3+1 dimensions. Here r is the spatial distance between two stationary disturbances in the field.

Homework Equations



In 3+1 we start from E = - \int \frac{ d^3 k }{(2\pi)^3} \frac{1}{ {\bf{k}}^2 + m^2 } e^{ i {\bf{k}} \cdot ( {\bf{x}}_1 - {\bf{x}}_2 ) } where \bf{k} is momentum, and \bf{x}_i are the spatial locations of the two disturbances.

The Attempt at a Solution



I think in 2+1 we must use the equation E = - \int \frac{ d^2 k }{(2\pi)^2} \frac{1}{ {\bf{k}}^2 + m^2 } e^{ i {\bf{k}} \cdot ( {\bf{x}}_1 - {\bf{x}}_2 ) }. I begin by transforming to polar coordinates, i.e. E = - \frac{1}{(2\pi)^2} \int_{0}^{\infty} dk \int_{0}^{2\pi} d\theta \frac{k}{ k^2 + m^2 } e^{ i k r \cos\theta }.

However, I am not sure what to do with this. As far as I know the theta integral can't be done in this form, and the r integral extends only down to 0, preventing it from being amenable to countour integration methods.

I tried a common trick of writing:

E = - \frac{1}{(2\pi)^2} \int_{0}^{\infty} dk \int_{0}^{2\pi} d\theta \frac{\partial}{\partial r} \frac{1}{i\cos\theta} \frac{1}{ k^2 + m^2 } e^{ i k r \cos\theta }

Which just makes the integral worse (I think). Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
Scott
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xGAME-OVERx said:
I think in 2+1 we must use the equation E = - \int \frac{ d^2 k }{(2\pi)^2} \frac{1}{ {\bf{k}}^2 + m^2 } e^{ i {\bf{k}} \cdot ( {\bf{x}}_1 - {\bf{x}}_2 ) }. I begin by transforming to polar coordinates, i.e. E = - \frac{1}{(2\pi)^2} \int_{0}^{\infty} dk \int_{0}^{2\pi} d\theta \frac{k}{ k^2 + m^2 } e^{ i k r \cos\theta }.

However, I am not sure what to do with this. As far as I know the theta integral can't be done in this form, and the r integral extends only down to 0, preventing it from being amenable to countour integration methods.

Integration over \theta gives you the Bessel function of the first kind.

This leave you with E = - \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_0^{\infty} dk \frac{k}{k^2 + m^2} J_0 (kr)

This I think is another Bessel function...Second Kind...I think. Look it up in a table.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your reply, but that doesn't match any of the definitions I have seen for Bessel functions. May I ask which definition you are using?

Thanks
Scott

EDIT: Sorry, found it in Abramowitz & Stegun...
 
Last edited:
xGAME-OVERx said:
Thank you for your reply, but that doesn't match any of the definitions I have seen for Bessel functions. May I ask which definition you are using?

Thanks
Scott

EDIT: Sorry, found it in Abramowitz & Stegun...

Rewrite the integral in term of a new variable t = \cos\theta. Then it conforms to the first integral representation here: http://functions.wolfram.com/Bessel-TypeFunctions/BesselJ/07/01/01/
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K