Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Master Constraint and canonical LQG

  1. Nov 18, 2009 #1
    So Thieman and co are still working on the Master Constraint program for canonical, non-SF, LQG?

    I thought that approach was dead and given way to SF ala Rovelli
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 18, 2009 #2

    atyy

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Looks like they are relating it to spin foams.

    http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.3428
    "The corrections are especially severe if the theory suffers from second class secondary constraints. In a companion paper we compute these corrections for the Holst and Plebanski formulations of GR on which current spin foam models are based. "

    http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.3431
    "Then the Master Constraint DID for those Abelian constraints can be directly related to the Rigging Map and therefore has a path integral formulation. "

    Maybe they will make tom.stoer happy?
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2009
  4. Nov 19, 2009 #3

    MTd2

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    The weird thing here it is that Marcus did not open a thread with over 9000 insightful posts...
     
  5. Nov 20, 2009 #4

    tom.stoer

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    I think Thiemann is doing what I expected to be relevant for both canonical and PI QG. Either relate the canonical approach to spin foams and proof equivalence - or demonstrate where and why this fails.

    Thiemann writes "Path integral formulations for gauge theories must start from the canonical formulation in order to obtain the correct measure." I fully agree with him. For me any path integral is always a derived object.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook