Master Moment of Inertia with Integration: Rod, Disk & Center Axis Solutions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the moment of inertia using integration for a rod and a disk with varying density functions. The correct expression for the rod's mass per unit length is clarified as λ=λ₀|x|, leading to the moment of inertia result I=1/8 ML². For the disk, participants discuss using polar coordinates to solve the problems, emphasizing the importance of the area element dA=rdrdθ. The conversation highlights the confusion caused by potential typos in the professor's assignments, but participants provide helpful guidance to each other. Overall, the thread illustrates the collaborative effort to understand complex physics concepts related to moment of inertia.
acgold
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I've been doing moment of inertia problems and haven't had any trouble so far until these:

Using integration, find the moment of inertia of a rod about an axis through its center if the mass per unit length is \lambda=\lambda_o x. The answer is supposed to come out to I=\frac 1 8 ML^2.

Using integration, find the moment of inertia of a disk of radius a, about its center if a) \sigma=\sigma_o r^{-1} b) \sigma=\sigma_o r^2. The answers are a) I=\frac 1 3 Ma^2 b) I=\frac 2 3 Ma^2

Even with the answer I'm confused :confused:. Please please help me out...thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, I'll do the first one for you.

The line density is given as \lambda=\lambda_{0}x

It's no wonder that you are stuck with this exercise, because this expression is by itself meaningless.
The correct expression must be:
\lambda=\lambda_{0}|x|, -L/2<=x<=L/2
i.e the absolute value of x, rather than x itself.
(I assume you gave us ALL the information present in the exercise?)
We gain:
I=\int_{-\frac{L}{2}}^{\frac{L}{2}}\lambda_{0}|x|{x}^{2}dx=\lambda_{0}\frac{2}{4}(\frac{L}{2})^{4}

The mass M of the rod is readily calculated:
M=\int_{-\frac{L}{2}}^{\frac{L}{2}}\lambda_{0}|x|dx=\lambda_{0}(\frac{L}{2})^{2}
Combining the expressions yiels the desired result.
 
Thank you thank you thank you...I've been working on that problem for hours. Yeah I gave you ALL the information I had. My professor is notorious for having typos. I did the first problem the way you showed me and I understand it 100% now. I'm off to work on the last two on my own...thanks for all your help. BTW, how did you know it was the absolute value of x? Do the sigma expressions require absolute values also? Thanks again.
 
My reasoning was as follows:
1. Density has to be non-negative.
Hence, the only meaningful interpretation of the given expression as it stood, was that x is measured from one end of the rod (x=0 at one end) , but that does not give the stated expression.

2. Hence, I assumed that the density functionshould bemeasured from the point of the rotation axis, but then I had to introduce the absolute value in order to have a meaningful density function.

3. As to the area densities, I don't think so, since the radius pr. definition is non-negative (I haven't checked them yet)
 
Last edited:
Thanks, you're a much better teacher than my professor. :) I've been working on the second problem for a few minutes now and I'm stuck again. Maybe another typo...I don't know but I'll keep trying it.
 
Well, thanks for the compliment, :smile:
(But there has to be a good reason why he's a professor, and I'm not!)
Your professor has the second problem right.
In order to solve it, you must use polar coordinates!
Remember that the proper area element, dA, has the form: dA=rdrd\theta,
with the limits:
0\leq{r}\leq{a},0\leq\theta\leq2\pi
Good luck!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top