Master Recurring Decimals Conversion with My Advanced Math Tips

  • Thread starter Thread starter unihopes92
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on converting recurring decimals to fractions, specifically addressing errors in calculations. The user presents their method for converting 0.34... and 0.57..., but the book's answers differ from their results. Key corrections involve proper subtraction of terms when eliminating decimals, leading to different fraction outcomes. The correct conversions are identified as 31/90 for 0.34... and 38/90 for 0.57.... The thread emphasizes the importance of accurate subtraction in the conversion process.
unihopes92
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
need help! recuuring decimals

hey, I'm in yr 11 advanced maths and I'm on a section in my book, where I'm converting recurring decimals to common fractions. i have a series of questions, after i finished the first couple i cheeked the back of the book to make sure I did them correctly but the book says they are all wrong. hears what i did and the books answer after it. p.s. the last digit is the only recurring decimal eg 4 out of .34...

.34... .57...
x=.34... x=.57...
10x=3.4... 10x=5.7...
100x=34.4... 100x=57.7...
100x-10x=34 90x=57
x=34/90 x=57/90
x=17/45 x=19/30

book answer
31/90 38/90
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org


For instance, in the first case, if x = 0.344444(etc); 10x = 3.44444(etc); 100x = 34.444444(etc) , so what does 34.444444(etc) - 3.44444(etc) equal?
 


unihopes92 said:
hey, I'm in yr 11 advanced maths and I'm on a section in my book, where I'm converting recurring decimals to common fractions. i have a series of questions, after i finished the first couple i cheeked the back of the book to make sure I did them correctly but the book says they are all wrong. hears what i did and the books answer after it. p.s. the last digit is the only recurring decimal eg 4 out of .34...

.34... .57...
x=.34... x=.57...
10x=3.4... 10x=5.7...
100x=34.4... 100x=57.7...
100x-10x=34 90x=57
No, it should be 100x 10x= 34.4...-3.4... so 90x= 31, not 34.

Similarly, subtracting 10x= 5.7... from 100x= 57.7... gives 90x= 57.7... - 5.7... or 90x= 52, not 57.

x=34/90 x=57/90
x=17/45 x=19/30

book answer
31/90 38/90
 


thanks for the help! XD
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top