Building a library of physics and math texts

  • Thread starter Thread starter loom91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Building Physics
AI Thread Summary
A project is underway to create a library of physics and math texts suitable for self-study at a graduate level, balancing rigor and accessibility. The initial list includes foundational and advanced texts across various physics topics such as classical mechanics, electrodynamics, and quantum mechanics, alongside recommendations for mathematics that support these subjects. Participants in the discussion suggest additional titles and express the need for a structured approach to mathematics, emphasizing areas like topology and analysis. There is a focus on ensuring that the selected texts complement each other effectively for a comprehensive educational experience. The project aims to provide a thorough resource for intelligent self-learners in physics and mathematics.
  • #51
as i look around at my own library whic keeps growing, it dwns on me it is more beneficial to just read a few of them than keep acquiring them. even one book like courant, well read, would change a man.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
siddharth said:
:smile: I have time, and am working on it. Could you recommend introductory texts in the aforementioned subjects at the advanced undergrad/beginning graduate level?

Manifolds:

William M. Boothby, An Introduction to Differentiable Manifolds and Riemannian Geometry, Academic Press, 1986. Might look a bit unfriendly but actually very well written.

John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, GTM 218, Springer, 2003. See also his other two books, which complement this one. Worthwhile for emphasis on level of structure alone!

Exterior calculus:

Flanders, Differential Forms with Applications to the Physical Sciences, Dover reprint. The most user friendly introduction, also very nice chapter on matrix Lie groups and the Maurer-Cartan form.

Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds is good for some things.

Differential geometry:

Too many books to mention. The five volume book by Spivak has wonderful stuff but I find the notation over-fussy and off-putting.

Chris J. Isham, Modern Differential Geometry for Physicists. A nice short book, not unsuitable as a supplementary text for math students.

Lie theory:

Bump, op cit.

The little book by Segal, Carter, and McDonald, LMS student text Vol. 32, is too sketchy to use as a textbook but is highly readable and very inspiring. (There is a mistake in the discussion of Penrose's description of the night sky via the Lorentz group.)

The books by Vadarajan, Humphreys, and Knapp are all excellent but maybe not the best first text. The book by Gilmore, Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Some of Their Applications is notable for an unique mathematical symbol (a picture of banannas which appears as an argument), and has many convenient tables and is a bit more historical than some. The books by Hermann are idiosyncratic but intriguing, time permitting.

If you have any more questions, don't take it personally if I don't reply (lack of time, etc). Good luck!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top