Mastering Quartic & Quintic Graphing w/o a Calculator for Pre-Calc 12

Martin Zhao
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
For pre-calculus 12, is there a need for students to master the ability of graphing quartic or quintic functions without using graphing calculator?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Martin Zhao said:
For pre-calculus 12, is there a need for students to master the ability of graphing quartic or quintic functions without using graphing calculator?
I think it depends on how the functions are presented and how complicated they are. If they are given in factored form, then it's useful to be able to graph them. If they are not given in factored form it would be difficult or even impossible (in the case of some 5th degree polynomials) to find the exact values of the x-intercepts.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
For the senior high students, do you suggest them getting a graphing calculator in class?
 
Martin Zhao said:
For the senior high students, do you suggest them getting a graphing calculator in class?

I have never used a graphing calculator in my life and I never needed it. So unless your teacher specifically told you that you need one for class, I wouldn't bother.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top