Materials Science vs. Materials Engineering

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the distinctions and overlaps between materials science and materials engineering, exploring their respective focuses, career paths, and educational opportunities. Participants share personal experiences and insights regarding research and job prospects in these fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that materials science focuses on research and development of new materials, while materials engineering is more about applying existing materials in product development.
  • One participant argues that at the undergraduate level, the distinction between materials science and materials engineering is minimal, as both are often housed in engineering departments and straddle both disciplines.
  • Another participant shares their experience of being qualified for both research and manufacturing roles, indicating that the choice between the two may not be as clear-cut until job applications begin.
  • There are mentions of specific research interests, such as corrosion in steels and aluminum for the nuclear industry, highlighting the diversity of research topics within materials science.
  • Concerns are raised about the difficulty of establishing oneself in a research group, with one participant suggesting that good academic performance and proactive engagement with researchers can facilitate this process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the clarity of the distinction between materials science and materials engineering, with some asserting that the fields are closely related and others emphasizing their differences. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best path for students interested in these disciplines.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that job prospects may vary by region and that the landscape for materials scientists can differ significantly based on industry demand and specific research areas.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering a career in materials science or materials engineering, individuals exploring research opportunities in these fields, and those interested in the job market for materials graduates.

bublik13
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I'm torn between the two options, and I would appreciate it if someone with experience could help me contrast materials science with materials engineering.

From what I've heard, materials science ultimately leads towards research, and development of new material.

Materials Engineers, on the other hand, apply existing materials for the development of products - they are not too concerned with developing new ones, just maximizing use of existing ones.

Please expand, contrast and correct my views. :shy:

As of now, I think I would be more inclined towards research of new products - that sounds far more fascinating in my opinions. However, I would still appreciate a detailed outline of both disciplines.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To be honest, the biggest difference is the spelling, e.g. I've just finished a B.Eng in Materials Science, and there really isn't a distinction (at least at an undergraduate level).

They are usually held in engineering departments because they are "applied", but Materials neatly straddles both science and engineering so separating them isn't really appropriate.

I moved into the research side (doctorate starts in September) but I was equally qualified and got job offers for car manufacture, light alloy aerospace manufacture, solar power and wind power jobs/projects. During my degree I as drawn to certain research areas and worked to get placements in research, so by the end of my degree my CV was focused towards research. My classmates worked in foundries, etc, so they are very much focused on manufacture.

This is just my opinion, but in truth I didn't really have to "choose" between research and manufacture until I started applied for jobs.

Where are you considering applying?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Primordial Sea
That's interesting, I was wondering why both the science and engineering are referred to simultaneously in descriptions. Thanks for the imput, it helped a lot.

I live in Ontario so I'm choosing between the university of Toronto and university of Waterloo.

It's also good to know that there are job prospects in the field. So what kind of research do you plan on pursuing during/after your doctorate? Are you happy with what you're studying? I have never really talked to anyone before who was in the field, so everything that you said was extremely helpful, thanks.
 
I'm looking at corrosion in steels and aluminium. It's geared towards the nuclear industry, as these alloys are expected to last long times.

I'm really happy with what I do, because I like the topic, have been given fairly free range, and I get on well with my supervisor and research group.

Both Toronto and and Waterloo are great. Roger Newman at Toronto is a bit of a legend in the corrosion field, but that's more of a selling point for me than you.

I can only speaking intelligently about the situation in the UK, but there are more jobs than good graduates here for materials scientists. Energy is the "new black" here at the moment, with a lot of companies hiring materials grads for wind power, and some for PV electricity. Metallurgy, e.g casting and forging, are also hiring for power generation and also chassis and engine manufacture.
 
That sounds great, and I wish you luck in your area of research.

I'm aiming for a specific research award offered by the university of Waterloo, for first-year honours chemistry students. If I get that award, I think I might just study general chemistry, honours, because it's what I like and undergraduate research is a great opportunity. Materials science is kind of a derivation from it, from what I understand, so it will still be keeping my options open. My alternative is the specialist UofT Materials Science program, but the only reason I'm considering waterloo is for the potential to do research at my first year (kind of unlikely).

Anyway, was it hard for you to establish yourself in your research group? I mean, they don't just take everyone, so it must have been pretty hard to get there. The way you say that "you moved to the research side" makes it sound a lot more easier than I suspect it to be.
 
bublik13 said:
The way you say that "you moved to the research side" makes it sound a lot more easier than I suspect it to be.

Once you decide you want to do research, its not that hard. Just get good marks, go talk to researchers, get Summer placements, and show some interest.

I did my summer placements in external research institutions (synchrotrons in europe), but universities usually have some also. It wasn't hard to establish myself, because I was an undergrad so expectations are pretty low. At the beginning all you have to do is what you are told and not screw up too badly.
 
Alright, thanks for the advice, it helped a lot :)
Good luck in your research
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K