Math courses for next semester.

  • Thread starter Thread starter gravenewworld
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Courses Semester
gravenewworld
Messages
1,128
Reaction score
27
Can someone please tell me what Lie Algebra is all about in a simple manner, I am not a PhD mathematician. I am trying to decide what I should do my independent study on next semester. I was thinking of studying an introduction to Lie Algebra or Mathematical Logic. Which of the two would be better to study? Any recommendations? Which branch is used more? Opinions? Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First of all a Lie algebra is an algebra. That is it is a vector space with a product. The product is a special kind often represented by a bracket [x,y], which takes two vectors and spits out another vector. And it has the key property that [x,y] = -[y,x] for all x and y. So the Lie algebras are all anticommutative. Another property the product has is the Jacobi identity: [x,[y,z]] + [y,[z,x]] + [z,[x,y]] = 0.

Lie algebras arise from Lie groups. Every Lie group is a manifold and it has a tangent space. And the local tangent space (the fiber) over the group identity is uniquely defined as a Lie algebra. The tangent space is spanned by a set of basis vectors X^a and the product is given by [X^a,X^b] = f^{ab}_cX^c, where the f 's are numbers determined by the group. By studying the Lie algebra you can find out things about the group. Often in physical situations where they have a group (such as a gauge group), they find it easier to work with the Lie algebra.

Lots of standard results about which common Lie groups have which Lie algebras. The group only has one Lie algebra, but the same Lie algebra can come from more than one group.

A lot of any course in Lie algebras consists of ways to classify them. This gets into Dynkin diagrams which are almost magical in some ways - John Baez just loves them - but which I am NOT going to get into here!
 
Maybe I should say I'm planning to do set theory as directed studies (there's no regular course on that) next term because it's close to the foundations. That is, stuff like Zorn's lemma (& its equivalents) are used all throughout analysis, algebra, etc; Dedekind cuts & transfinite arithmetic, etc have been mentioned in courses up to this point also, so I think it would be good to do some of that stuff too. I think it would really help me because sets are so fundamental to those areas. Now guess which course, out of mathematical logic or Lie algebras, I'd pick if I had to pick only one... :wink:

I'm more interested in pure math though; if you're more interested in applied math or physics I would say Lie groups/algebras over mathematical logic since Lie groups/algebras are used a lot in quantum mechanics. (from what I've heard; I think it has something to do with symmetry)
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
43
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Back
Top