Math graphics publishing software

TheRealColbert
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
What graphics publishing tools are commonly used for textbooks, journals, etc? (I am thinking of the 3D plots one might find in a calculus book, things like that)

It seems like Mathematica, Maple, and Matlab are great for plotting, but are they also suitable for publishing? They don't seem to have the same appearance as professional quality graphics, but maybe I have not investigated enough. Also, it seems like it would be difficult to make subtle modifications, such as line weight, type, etc.

One of my textbooks which has great graphics says they were created with CorelDraw, but that sounds unappealing. Google Sketchup is appealing, but it has difficulties too.

Ideally, it would be nice to create a plot in a math program and export it to a graphics program for final editing, similar to what you can do with an architectural cad program. That may not exist, though.

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
using mathematica it is relatively easy to change things line line width, type and so on. it is just a matter of using the right options (v7 has what amounts to a "wizard" for plotting where all one has to do is fill in the desired parameters, the syntax is already done).
I don't know much about other mathematics graphing softwares, but i imagine that they operate in pretty much the same way.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top