Math name for asymetric-pair relationship?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Peanut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relationship
Mr Peanut
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Math name for "asymetric-pair" relationship?

Say I have a function (F) that takes an input (P) and returns an output (E). Suppose F isn't invertible so, knowing F and E, one could not reconstruct P.

Suppose also that there is another function (R) that can take E as input and returns P... without any prior knowledge about P other than it was generated with F. (R could also be non-invertible but need not necessarily be.)

I know the computer people refer to an imperfect, practical application of this idea as public key encryption or asymmetric encryption. It assumes that prime number factors for large numbers cannot be determined analytically in practical time.

But the concept has a perfect, general, underlying mathematical interpretation.

1) Does mathematics have a name for such a pair of functions?

2) Could they, in fact, exist?

3) If they do exist; are there any examples?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


If I'm not mistaken, R is a left inverse of F since, as you've defined it,
<br /> R(F(P)) = R(E) = P<br />
for any P in the domain of F. Therefore R \circ F = \text{id}.

For an easy example, consider the functions f(x) = \tan(x) and g(x) = \arctan{x} defined on the reals. Then f(g(x)) = x but g(f(x))= x+2 \pi n.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top