Math or physics class recommendation?

AI Thread Summary
A recent graduate with a BS in chemistry is preparing for potential PhD studies in physical chemistry and is considering auditing upper-level math or physics courses to enhance their knowledge before starting graduate school. They have a solid foundation in mathematics, including calculus, discrete math, and linear algebra, but are particularly interested in learning about differential equations and Fourier analysis. Suggestions from the discussion include focusing on advanced topics such as modern physics or quantum mechanics, and utilizing self-study resources like "Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers" and other recommended textbooks. There's also a mention of exploring advanced electricity and magnetism courses and the possibility of sitting in on lectures. Overall, the emphasis is on supplementing existing knowledge through targeted coursework and self-directed learning.
-DB
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
This is sort of a two part question, so bear with me.

I just recently graduated with a BS in chemistry, and I applied to a couple PhD programs for next fall (I deliberately waited until after graduating to apply to graduate school for a number of reasons!). I'm working a part time job right now (chemistry related) which I very much enjoy, but I'm not entirely sure how long it will last.

Anyways, this spring I was thinking of seeing if I could sit in or audit some kind of upper level math or physics class, just so I could pick up a few things before I start graduate school (assuming I get in somewhere!). I was wondering if any of you have suggestions as to what kind of class I should take. I'm probably going to do physical chemistry in graduate school. Also, I graduated with a math minor, so I have 3 semesters of calculus, discrete math, and linear algebra under my belt. I'm thinking of maybe looking into a class where I could learn some things about say, for example, differential equations, or Fourier analysis.

Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your math is probably OK for the time being. For a physics class, I would recommend a good "Modern (20th century) Physics" class if you haven't had one already. If you have had such a class, then I would recommend an intro to quantum mechanics course.
 
-DB said:
This is sort of a two part question, so bear with me.

I just recently graduated with a BS in chemistry, and I applied to a couple PhD programs for next fall (I deliberately waited until after graduating to apply to graduate school for a number of reasons!). I'm working a part time job right now (chemistry related) which I very much enjoy, but I'm not entirely sure how long it will last.

Anyways, this spring I was thinking of seeing if I could sit in or audit some kind of upper level math or physics class, just so I could pick up a few things before I start graduate school (assuming I get in somewhere!). I was wondering if any of you have suggestions as to what kind of class I should take. I'm probably going to do physical chemistry in graduate school. Also, I graduated with a math minor, so I have 3 semesters of calculus, discrete math, and linear algebra under my belt. I'm thinking of maybe looking into a class where I could learn some things about say, for example, differential equations, or Fourier analysis.

Any suggestions?

I guess you should have learned DE and Fourier Analysis during your BS degree. Personnally I won't advise you to waste your money if you want to learn just DE and Fourier Analysis. Why not just buy Mathematical Methods for Sicentists and Engineers? It may help.
 
kuruman said:
Your math is probably OK for the time being. For a physics class, I would recommend a good "Modern (20th century) Physics" class if you haven't had one already. If you have had such a class, then I would recommend an intro to quantum mechanics course.

Thanks, I'll keep that in mind! I think I might also check out the advanced electricity and magnetism class that my school offers. I might be able to just ask the professor if i could sit in on a few lectures every now and then - I've done that in the past without any problems.

mccoy1 said:
I guess you should have learned DE and Fourier Analysis during your BS degree. Personnally I won't advise you to waste your money if you want to learn just DE and Fourier Analysis. Why not just buy Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers? It may help.


Yeah, I kind of thought it was a little odd that I never had to take a DE class. I'll check out that book. Who is/are the author(s)?
 
I have mathematical methods for scientists and Engineers( assumed knowledge here and there though) by McQuarie, Which I like. My brother has Mathematical methods in Physical Sciences by Mary Boa...it's quite good as well. You may find it useful to go to your school library/or nearby lib and borrow one or both of those books and go through them and decide if they offer the mathematical tecniques rigor you need.
I also have Chemistry maths book by Erich Steiner on the shelf here (..no assumed knowledge and quite good for undergraduates).It covers DEs, Fourier Analysis,Orthoganal matrices, symmetry(Group theory) etc. You may check it out as well.
Cheers.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Back
Top