Math Physics-Equation of Continuity

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics2112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a fluid dynamics problem involving the equation of continuity and the total time derivative of density. Participants are trying to prove that dp/dt = ∂tρ + v · ∇ρ and combine it with the equation of continuity to show that ρ∇·v + dρ/dt = 0. There is confusion regarding the correct form of the total derivative and which equation of continuity to use, as different versions exist. The importance of conservation of mass is highlighted as a key concept in deriving the relevant equations. Assistance is offered to clarify these mathematical relationships and concepts.
physics2112
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



PARTA:
Consider a fluid in which \rho = \rho(x,y,z,t); that is the density varies from point to point and with time. The velocity of this fluid at a point is
v= (dx/dt, dy/dt, dz/ dt)
Show that
dp/dt = \partialt\rho + v \cdot \nabla\rho

PARTB:
Combine the above equation with the equation of continuity and prove that
\rho\nabla\cdot v + d\rho /dt = 0

I have been attempting this problem for over a week. If anyone can solve this problem or help me out I would really appreciate it!

(Between the \nabla and v is a dot but I am not sure if it is showing up!)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For part a, how'd you write the total time derivative of rho in terms of its partial derivatives?

For part b, what do you think the relevant equations are?
 
I used the symbols to write out rho with a subscript...is that what you meant?
That is the equation we have to show...so I have no clue how they got it mathematically.

For the second your suppose to use the equation of continuity...which I'm not sure which one they mean as I find various examples of it.
 
What I meant is this : suppose I have a function f(x,y). Can you write down the total derivative of f w.r.t x i.e df/dx in terms of the partial derivatives \partial_{x}f and \partial_{y}f ? If you can do that for f and x, go ahead and do it for rho and t.

If you aren't sure of which equation of continuity to use, why not let's go ahead and derive it! The key concept is conservation of mass. Let me know if you'd like a bit of help with that.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top