Math problem regarding kinetic motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter danong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinetic Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a body moving with uniform retardation. The key points include determining the initial velocity, which is calculated to be 41 m/s, and the uniform retardation, found to be -2 m/s². Participants clarify that the motion can be analyzed using standard equations of motion despite initial assumptions about non-linear movement. The solution involves setting up equations based on the distances traveled in specific seconds and solving for the unknowns. Ultimately, the problem is resolved with a better understanding of the concepts involved.
danong
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Sorry, i have problem in this question which comes from my textbook. I couldn't solve it and i would like someone to guide me.

(Question)
A body travels 30 metres in the sixth second of motion and 24 meters in the ninth second. Find:
i) the initial velocity (ans: 41 m/s )
ii) the retardation, assumed uniform (ans: -2 m/s/s )
iii) the time elapsing before coming to rest (ans: 20.5s)


From my thinking is that, the body is actually moving in a curve so it changes its displacement from 30 meters to 24 meters within the time [6~9] seconds,
but this problem is in charge of kinetic problem as well, as it's in the chapter 'kinetic'.
And since it's not moving in a straightline, i assume that it cannot apply the ordinary equation : S = u * t * 1/2 a*t^2;
But by only reconstructing the equation from a = dv/dt;

Plus, the retardation and initial velocity seems to be dependantly constant variable. So my guess is that, since it involves friction, i would simply guess that it's actually having altering of work as :
Sum(W) = Fn * d(Sn);
where W is the total Work,
Fn is the changing of Forces within the time interval [0,t];
dSn is the delta of distance traveled within time interval [0,t];


Thanks in advance.
Daniel.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
danong said:
Sorry, i have problem in this question which comes from my textbook. I couldn't solve it and i would like someone to guide me.

(Question)
A body travels 30 metres in the sixth second of motion and 24 meters in the ninth second. Find:
i) the initial velocity (ans: 41 m/s )
ii) the retardation, assumed uniform (ans: -2 m/s/s )
iii) the time elapsing before coming to rest (ans: 20.5s)


From my thinking is that, the body is actually moving in a curve so it changes its displacement from 30 meters to 24 meters within the time [6~9] seconds
From my thinking, this means that the velocity changes from 30 m/s to 24 m/s in the [6, 9] s time interval.

Also, "the retardation is assumed uniform" sounds to me like "the acceleration is constant", which means the formula
s(t) = s_0 + v_0 t + \tfrac12 a t^2
will certainly hold (it follows from solving
s''(t) = a
with the appropriate boundary conditions).

but this problem is in charge of kinetic problem as well, as it's in the chapter 'kinetic'.
"Kinetic" basically just means "movement". E.g. "kinetic energy" is just "movement energy", in a quite literal translation.
But perhaps what is meant is, that you should solve it using energies instead of dynamic equations?
 
danong said:
Sorry, i have problem in this question which comes from my textbook. I couldn't solve it and i would like someone to guide me.

(Question)
A body travels 30 metres in the sixth second of motion and 24 meters in the ninth second. Find:
i) the initial velocity (ans: 41 m/s )
ii) the retardation, assumed uniform (ans: -2 m/s/s )
iii) the time elapsing before coming to rest (ans: 20.5s)


From my thinking is that, the body is actually moving in a curve so it changes its displacement from 30 meters to 24 meters within the time [6~9] seconds,
but this problem is in charge of kinetic problem as well, as it's in the chapter 'kinetic'.
And since it's not moving in a straightline, i assume that it cannot apply the ordinary equation : S = u * t * 1/2 a*t^2;
But by only reconstructing the equation from a = dv/dt;

Plus, the retardation and initial velocity seems to be dependantly constant variable. So my guess is that, since it involves friction, i would simply guess that it's actually having altering of work as :
Sum(W) = Fn * d(Sn);
where W is the total Work,
Fn is the changing of Forces within the time interval [0,t];
dSn is the delta of distance traveled within time interval [0,t];


Thanks in advance.
Daniel.
Why do you assert "it's not moving in a straightline"? I can find no where in the problem statement that it is said it is not moving in a straight line. "Kinetic" simply means "moving"- not necessarily moving in a curve.

Assuming constant acceleration, a, (although that's not mentioned until (b)), a body will move (1/2)at2+ v0t where v0 is the initial speed. After 5 seconds, it will have gone (25/2)a+ 5v0. After 6 seconds, it will have gone (36/2)a+ 6v. During the "6th second", it will have gone (36/2)a+ 6v0- ((25/2)a+ 5v0= (11/2)a+ v0= 30. Do the same for the distances traveled in 8 and 9 minutes, setting the difference equal to 24 and you have two equations to solve for a and v0.
 
oh yes! i misunderstood the question by assuming it has "travelled along". Thanks everyone for the answer and detailed explanation. I got it solved. ^^
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top