How do I construct a cubic inequality with specific solution sets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iluvrotinsaag
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To construct a cubic inequality with the solution sets -2 < x < 0 and x > 3, one can start with the polynomial (x + 2)(x)(x - 3) = x^3 + 5x^2 + 6x. This polynomial is zero at the points -2, 0, and 3, indicating where it changes sign. By testing values in the intervals defined by these roots, it can be determined that the inequality x^3 + 5x^2 + 6x > 0 holds for x < -2 and 0 < x < 3. Conversely, if the problem required the complement set, the inequality x^3 + 5x^2 + 6x < 0 would apply. The key takeaway is to analyze the polynomial's behavior around its roots to construct the desired inequality.
iluvrotinsaag
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Math problems!

I understand how to solve this inequality, but i do not know what sign to put (greater than or less than) in my answer. I would really appreciate it if someone could explain this concept to me. THanks

Write a cubic inequality that has this solution:
-2<X<0, x>3
(X)(X+2)(X-3)
(X^2 +2X) (X-3)
X^3 - X^2 - 6X (< or >) 0
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Whoa, hold on. What's the inequality?

x>3 into the expression x^3 - x^2 - 6x?

What's the -2<x<0?

cookiemonster
 
teh cubic inequality is:
-2<X<0 and x>3
 
I've never heard of a cubic inequality before (other than a cubic polynomial used in an inequality), so I'll just butt out of this before I make a fool of myself again.

cookiemonster
 
you can always check if you have the inequality the right way round you do not need a method for checking if its "<" or ">" other than subbing in points

for example
when x=4, the statement x> 3 is true
and the statement 4^3-4^2-6*4=24 > 0 is true so the answer better be
x^3 - x^2 - 6x> 0
not x^3 - x^2 - 6x <0.


There is no mystery here just sketch the curve y=x^3 - x^2 - 6x
and notice there are two regions above the x-axis, one region has the property that all x values are between -2 and 0 (-2< x< 0) and the other region is x>3
 
Apparently the problem is not to "solve an inequality" but to construct an inequality having all numbers between -2 and 0 and all numbers above 3 as solutions.

Start by constructing an equation:

(x-(-2))(x-0)(x-3)= (x+2)(x)(x-3)= x3+ 5x2+ 6x= 0 is 0 at exactly -2, 0, and 3. Since a polynomial is continuous, it can change from positive to negative and vice-versa only where it is 0.

Now check what happens in between: at x= 1, for example,
13+ 5(12)+ 6(1)= 1+ 5+ 6= 11> 0. Therefore, the inequality x3+ 5x2+ 6x> 0 has x<-2 and 0< x< 3 as solution set.

IF the problem had asked for the complement set: -2< x< 0, x> 3, then we would have tried x= -1, say, and found that
(-1)3+ 5(-1)2+ 6(-1)= -1+5-6= -2< 0.
The inequality x3+ 5x2+ 6x< 0 has that solution set.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top