Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Physics for High School Students

AI Thread Summary
To understand quantum physics, high school students should focus on mastering differential equations, both ordinary and partial, as well as orthogonal functions, Fourier transforms, complex variables, and linear algebra. These mathematical foundations are essential for tackling quantum mechanics effectively. Students acknowledge the challenge of learning this material, suggesting that a few years of study may be necessary before fully grasping quantum concepts. Many express a desire to gain a head start in their mathematical education to prepare for college-level physics. A supportive atmosphere is evident among students pursuing similar interests in theoretical physics.
KJB
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am a 16 year old high school student. I am really interested in Maths and its my passion.

I am also really interested in Quantum Physics and I would just like to know a list of what type of Maths (eg. Differential Calculus) I would need to learn to understand it.

I just need a list so I can learn it in my spare time.

Thanks,
KJB
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Definitely differential equations, both ordinary and partial. Orthogonal functions, Fourier transforms, complex variables, and a mastery of linear algebra. That will get you ready to tackle it.
 
I'm 15 and only doing multi-variable calculus, and physics. If you think you can tackle quantum mechanics in your spare time it might take a few years first (iff you're a prodigy you'll probably be able to do it).
 
Cbray said:
I'm 15 and only doing multi-variable calculus, and physics. If you think you can tackle quantum mechanics in your spare time it might take a few years first (iff you're a prodigy you'll probably be able to do it).

Yeah I'm not extremely smart but I'm looking at doing it for college/university so I am just trying to learn a bit of the math to give me a little bit of a head start.
 
KJB said:
Yeah I'm not extremely smart but I'm looking at doing it for college/university so I am just trying to learn a bit of the math to give me a little bit of a head start.

Me too, I'm interested in theoretical physics, I'll either go into theoretical astrophysics, or theoretical particle physics. Good luck
 
Cbray said:
Me too, I'm interested in theoretical physics, I'll either go into theoretical astrophysics, or theoretical particle physics. Good luck

Thanks mate, good luck to you too, you're already learning multi-variable calculus at 15. I'm only learning like basic calculus. You got a bright future man :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
826
Replies
13
Views
740
Replies
2
Views
408
Replies
18
Views
676
Replies
2
Views
604
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top