Mathematical induction and arithmetic progression

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around using mathematical induction to prove a formula related to an arithmetic progression. The initial proof for P(2) is confirmed as correct, but challenges arise in proving P(K+1). Participants discuss the need to establish a connection between the expressions derived from the induction hypothesis and the desired conclusion. One user expresses confusion about the relationship between their current expression and the target formula, seeking clarification on the induction hypothesis. The conversation highlights the complexities of applying induction in this context and the importance of clear connections between steps.
elitewarr
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


All the terms of the arithmetic progression u1,u2,u3...,un are positive. Use mathematical induction to prove that, for n>= 2, n is an element of all positive integers,

[ 1/ (u1u2) ] + [ 1/ (u2u3) ] + [ 1/ (u3u4) ] + ... + [ 1/ (un-1un) ] = ( n - 1 ) / ( u1un)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I proved that P(2) is true. However, I tried to prove that P(K+1) is true but to no avail.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the fact that {un} is an arithmetic sequence along with

\frac{1}{u_m} - \frac{1}{u_n} = \frac{u_n-u_m}{u_mu_n}
 
Solved. Thanks a lot!
 
This helped a lot for me on the induction concept:

http ://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Mathematical_induction
 
i know this thread is old... but i need a little help on the exact same question...

i'm stuck at:

P(k+1)=\frac{kU_{k+1}-U_{k+1}+U_1}{U_1U_kU_{k+1}}

i need to prove that this equals to:

\frac{k}{U_1U_{k+1}}

but i can't see the link at all... is there something missing ?~
 
claire44 said:
i know this thread is old... but i need a little help on the exact same question...

i'm stuck at:

P(k+1)=\frac{kU_{k+1}-U_{k+1}+U_1}{U_1U_kU_{k+1}}

i need to prove that this equals to:

\frac{k}{U_1U_{k+1}}

but i can't see the link at all... is there something missing ?~

What do you have for your induction hypothesis? I.e., P(k).
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top