Mathematician Turning to Physics Research

  • Thread starter Thread starter DogCow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematician
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the transition from mathematics to physics, particularly for someone with a strong background in algebra and a keen interest in applying mathematical concepts to physical problems. Key areas of mathematics that intersect with physics include Lie Theory, which is significant in particle physics, and Differential Geometry, crucial for cosmology. The conversation highlights the relevance of Quantum Groups, Symplectic Geometry, and Representation Theory as potential research topics for a PhD. It emphasizes the unpredictability of which mathematical areas will become relevant in physics, as advancements often depend on experimental data from physicists. The connection between Lie groups and physics is also noted as an important area of exploration.
DogCow
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
From Mathematics to Physics

Hey Everyone,

I've recently completed a BA and MSc in Mathematics at a great university. I've mostly been an Algebraist for the last four years and I've been successful so studying for a PhD would certainly be an option. While I still consider myself to be mostly a mathematician, I've always held an interest in Physics and I like the idea of working with problems in Mathematics that come from questions in Physics.

I understand that Lie Theory (which I love) is relevant to Particle Physics and that Differential Geometry is important in cosmology, but excluding these, I don't know what is relevant to current research. Quantum Groups? Symplectic Geometry? Representation theory? What are some hot areas of research that would make a good PhD project?

Thanks (and sorry for asking such a broad question).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would love to know how Lie groups connect with physics.

*no sarcasm.
 
Dogcow you could do research in any area connected to string theory. The thing is, no one knows what area of math is going to be relevant until the experimenters and phenomenologists provide more data.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top