Mathematicians Who Became Physicists

  • Thread starter Thread starter anonca
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physicists
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the intersection of physics and mathematics, highlighting several notable physicists with strong mathematical backgrounds, including Freeman Dyson and Roger Penrose. Participants emphasize that many individuals, such as John von Neumann and David Hilbert, have contributed to both fields, blurring the lines between them. The conversation advocates for recognizing the versatility of professionals who may not fit neatly into a single category, such as mathematicians, physicists, or engineers. Examples like Josiah Willard Gibbs illustrate the significant contributions individuals can make across disciplines. The thread also mentions various historical figures and their contributions, reinforcing the idea that expertise can span multiple domains without strict boundaries.
anonca
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I know of mainly two famous physicists who came from a distinguishly mathematical background:
Freeman Dyson
Roger Penrose

I'm sure there have been many, many, many others, so could anyone name me some more physicists who came from a mathematics background?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neumann, although some might not agree he was a physicist.
 
where do you draw the line anyway? Hilbert did some work on general relativity & I think kinetic theory of gases.
 
Fourier should come into this somehow?
 
epenguin said:
Fourier should come into this somehow?

Yes, he has his place in the series.
 
Or engineers developing mathematics such as Harry Nyquist.

People shouldn't necessarily be pegged as one thing or another. One can do mathematics, physics, or engineering, depending what hat one wants to wear at at the time. No individual has to exclusively choose a single one at the expense of the others.
 
lisab said:
Yes, he has his place in the series.

I'm responding simply because I think this post is worthy of recognition.
 
AnTiFreeze3 said:
I'm responding simply because I think this post is worthy of recognition.
I'll second that.
 
collinsmark said:
Or engineers developing mathematics such as Harry Nyquist.

People shouldn't necessarily be pegged as one thing or another. One can do mathematics, physics, or engineering, depending what hat one wants to wear at at the time. No individual has to exclusively choose a single one at the expense of the others.
True. People can often be recognized for their work that some might feel is "outside their field". That's OK.
 
  • #10
collinsmark said:
Or engineers developing mathematics such as Harry Nyquist.

People shouldn't necessarily be pegged as one thing or another. One can do mathematics, physics, or engineering, depending what hat one wants to wear at at the time. No individual has to exclusively choose a single one at the expense of the others.

To further expound on this, I was going to use Josiah Willard Gibbs as an example. He was awarded the first PhD in engineering in America, and contributed quite impressively (understatement) to many other fields.
 
  • #11
Newton - calculus, laws of motion, gravity
Lagrange - calculus of variations, Lagrangian formulation of mechanics
Hamilton - quaternions, Hamiltonian formulation of mechanics
Poincare - topology, symmetries of electrodynamics, stability of solar system
Kolmogorov, Arnold, Moser - stability of solar system
Ruelle, Takens - strange attractor, turbulence
Elie Cartan - differential geometry, general relativity
Birkhoff - ergodic theory, general relativity
Goedel - logic, general relativity
Yau - differential geometry, positive energy theorem
Arthur Jaffe - quantum field theory
Barry Simon - quantum field theory
Tadeusz Balaban - Yang-Mills theory
Peter Shor - quantum computation
Michael Freedman - topology, topological quantum computation
Andrew Hodges - twistors
John Baez - spin foams
Kevin Costello - quantum field theory
 
Last edited:
Back
Top