MHB Maths books should be read both forwards and backwards?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sherlock1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the idea that mathematics should be read both forwards and backwards, a concept possibly linked to Lagrange. Participants express uncertainty about the exact phrasing and origin of this quote. There is also a reference to Christopher Marlowe's play "Faustus," which features themes of incantation and the manipulation of knowledge. The conversation highlights the importance of revisiting mathematical texts for deeper understanding. Overall, the notion of dual reading in mathematics is explored as a means to enhance comprehension.
Sherlock1
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure where, but I remember reading something like that somewhere. It said 'mathematics should be read both forwards and backwards' or 'maths books should be read both forwards and backwards' or some variation of that, but I'm not sure exactly. I also remember it sort of had something to do with Lagrange, but whether he's the one who said it, I don't know. Does anyone know the exact quote or the person who said it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you be misremembering Marlow's diabolical play:

FAUSTUS.
Now that the gloomy shadow of the night,
Longing to view Orion's drizzling look,
Leaps from th' antartic world unto the sky,
And dims the welkin with her pitchy breath,
Faustus, begin thine incantations,
And try if devils will obey thy hest,
Seeing thou hast pray'd and sacrific'd to them.
Within this circle is Jehovah's name,
Forward and backward anagrammatiz'd
,
Th' abbreviated names of holy saints,
Figures of every adjunct to the heavens,
And characters of signs and erring stars,
By which the spirits are enforc'd to rise:
Then fear not, Faustus, to be resolute,
And try the utmost magic can perform.

CB (Devil) (Devil) (Devil)
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top