Maths question - multiplying by sin

  • Thread starter Thread starter questions_uk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sin
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a mathematical expression involving sine functions, where the user encounters errors on their calculator. Key points include confusion over the proper use of sine and arcsine functions, with clarification that these are not numbers that can be multiplied directly. The importance of understanding that sine functions require an argument (like sin(x)) is emphasized, and the user is encouraged to work through the calculations step-by-step. Ultimately, the user reports achieving some correct values that align with their lecture notes, indicating progress in understanding the problem. The conversation highlights the necessity of grasping trigonometric functions to solve related equations effectively.
questions_uk
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
hi there. I have an expression Sqrt of 0.6 / 0.2 x sin ^2 however it is giving an error on the calculator.

the equation am trying to work out is :

x = 25 x 10 ^ - 9 x sin ^ - 1 (Square Root of 0.6 / 0.2 x sin ^ 2) (4 x 25)) / ∏ x 4 x 10 ^ - 6

how can I work out x when am getting errors from putting? are the numbers 0.6 and 0.2 no valid for the sin domain? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I just want to see this in a "normal" equation form first (find this extended formula notation rather confusing), is your equation:

x=25\times10^{-9} \sin^{-1}(\frac{\sqrt{\frac{0.6}{0.2}}\sin^2[(4)(25)]}{4\times10^{-6}\pi})}

?
 
questions_uk said:
hi there. I have an expression Sqrt of 0.6 / 0.2 x sin ^2 however it is giving an error on the calculator.
Yes, that will give an error! sin^2 is meaningless. sine of WHAT number? In fact, I notice that you titled this "multiplying by sin". I assumed at first that was just a short way of writing "multiplying by sin(x)" but now I am wondering. Surely you understand that "sin" is a function, not a number- and you multiply both sides of an equation by number; sin(x) is a number.

the equation am trying to work out is :

x = 25 x 10 ^ - 9 x sin ^ - 1 (Square Root of 0.6 / 0.2 x sin ^ 2) (4 x 25)) / ∏ x 4 x 10 ^ - 6

how can I work out x when am getting errors from putting? are the numbers 0.6 and 0.2 no valid for the sin domain? thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
phyzmatix said:
I just want to see this in a "normal" equation form first (find this extended formula notation rather confusing), is your equation:

x=25\times10^{-9} \sin^{-1}(\frac{\sqrt{\frac{0.6}{0.2}}\sin^2[(4)(25)]}{4\times10^{-6}\pi})}

?

Yes.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, that will give an error! sin^2 is meaningless. sine of WHAT number? In fact, I notice that you titled this "multiplying by sin". I assumed at first that was just a short way of writing "multiplying by sin(x)" but now I am wondering. Surely you understand that "sin" is a function, not a number- and you multiply both sides of an equation by number; sin(x) is a number.

Hi. thanks for the reply. It is supposed to multiplied by a number ( ^-9) or (and which I think is the case) by the numbers in the bracket.
 
Well, "^-9" is not a number! And, in any case, sin(x) does NOT mean "sin multiplied by x".
 
Yeah I figured the latter bit. Say 25 x 10 ^ - 9 x Arcsin (Square Root of 0.6 / 0.2 x sin ^ 2) (4 x 25)) / ∏ x 4 x 10 ^ - 6)

Would the first thing not be to work out everything in the bracket then multiply it by arcsin? So take Square Root of 0.6 / 0.2 x sin ^ 2 bit first. Sqrt of 3 = 1.7 then x sin ^ 2. How would this be done?
 
questions_uk said:
Would the first thing not be to work out everything in the bracket then multiply it by arcsin?

You can't multiply by arcsin. Arcsin isn't a number, it's a function. I think you need to touch up a bit on your knowledge of trigonometry here.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Listen, the equation I have is the one that was mentioned, and there is an Arcsin next to 25 x 10 ^ -9 as well as the bracket. am trying to solve for x here. I haven't done this kind of maths in a good while.
 
  • #11
questions_uk said:
Listen, the equation I have is the one that was mentioned, and there is an Arcsin next to 25 x 10 ^ -9 as well as the bracket. am trying to solve for x here. I haven't done this kind of maths in a good while.

Please don't get irritated with us. We're not busting your nuts here, we're trying to help you understand what you are doing.

What HallsOfIvy and myself are trying to say is that you CAN'T multiply by sin or arcsin...They are functions. You CAN, however, multiply by sin(x) and arcsin(x). In other words (x)sin is meaningless, but sin(x) isn't.

If you don't understand this, then there is no way you will solve your problem (if indeed a solution exists).
 
  • #12
I'm not, but I worked it out and got a value anyway (not sure if it is right though!). Either way, thank you for your reply. it's appreciated. I did assumed sin ^ 2 (4 x theta) was sin ^ 2 multiplied by (4 x theta).
 
  • #13
questions_uk said:
I'm not, but I worked it out and got a value anyway (not sure if it is right though!). Either way, thank you for your reply. it's appreciated. I did assumed sin ^ 2 (4 x theta) was sin ^ 2 multiplied by (4 x theta).

It's not "multiplied by."

You might be using a calculator to correctly compute sin^2(4* theta), but you're still not understanding what Halls and phyzmatix have been saying -- that sin, arcsin (AKA sin^(-1), and sin^2 are not numbers that you can multiply other numbers by.

The buttons labeled sin, cos, tan, log, ln, e^x, and others are functions. Each of them performs a specific operation to whatever is showing on the display of the calculator.
 
  • #14
It might just be a translation problem.
 
  • #15
questions_uk said:
I'm not, but I worked it out and got a value anyway (not sure if it is right though!). Either way, thank you for your reply. it's appreciated. I did assumed sin ^ 2 (4 x theta) was sin ^ 2 multiplied by (4 x theta).

So does that mean everything is ok now? I hope so :smile:

HallsofIvy said:
It might just be a translation problem.

Good point.
 
  • #16
Yes I know and thanks. I assumed firstly that it was the function multiplied by a constant. but anyway, got a couple of values that seem on par with vales in the lecture notes so that's good! cheers.
 
Back
Top