Matrix, in which there is a column of 0's or a row of 0's

Gear300
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
9
Given an n x m matrix, in which there is a column of 0's or a row of 0's, would it be equivalent to write the matrix while neglecting the column or row of 0's?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


What do you mean by "equivalent"? If, for example, you were asked to the nullspace of a matrix, obviously, a row of 0's gives a solution that you would not get if you neglected that row.
 


If you are using a matrix to solve a system of equations (like one would do in a beginners linear algebra course), then you may skip writing rows of zeroes since they give you no information. But in general, you should not skip a row or column of zeroes since it changes the properties of the matrix (as mentioned above)
 


I see. Thanks for the replies.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top