Matrix Mechanics for the Bored Wave Mechanics Student

  • Thread starter Thread starter wavemaster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Mechanics
wavemaster
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
For someone who's bored with wave mechanics, would you suggest studying Heisenberg's matrix mechanics (which was the first formulation)?

Are there any major/conceptual differences? (except one talks about waves and the other doesn't!)
And for someone who wants to study it, what books/online docs would you suggest? Damn, all QM I have ever found covers wave-mechanics majorly, and some briefly mention matrix mechanics when the title hits angular momentum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at J. Townsend's text; if you find it too pedantic try J.J. Sakurai. Both are certainly in your school's library.

A short answer - there are major superficial differences. The "matrix mechanics" as you call it is a very general and abstract formalism; wave mechanics falls out easily as a special case. It is often more useful to work with waves, where everything is in differential equations.
 
Read Dirac's Quantum Mechanics.
regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top