Matrix Representation of a linear operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the linear operator T defined as T[a b; c d] = a + d, which computes the trace of a 2 by 2 matrix over the complex plane. The user seeks clarification on how to represent T as a matrix with respect to a basis, specifically the standard basis vectors for 2 by 2 matrices. It is established that the matrix representation of T will be a 1×4 matrix, which should be multiplied by a 4×1 matrix representing the 2 by 2 matrix, not a 2 by 2 matrix directly. Understanding the relationship between linear operators and their matrix representations is crucial for resolving the user's confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear operators and their properties
  • Familiarity with matrix representation of linear transformations
  • Knowledge of standard basis vectors for vector spaces
  • Basic concepts of matrix multiplication
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between linear operators and matrices in linear algebra
  • Learn about matrix representation of linear transformations in R^n
  • Explore the concept of basis vectors and their role in matrix representation
  • Investigate examples of linear operators and their matrix forms
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, matrix theory, and linear transformations. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of matrix representations of linear operators.

*FaerieLight*
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
T is a linear operator from the space of 2 by 2 matrices over the complex plane to the complex plane, that is
T: mat(2x2,C)[tex]\rightarrow[/tex]C, given by

T[a b; c d] = a + d

T operates on a 2 by 2 matrix with elements a, b, c, d, in case that isn't entirely clear. So T gives the trace of the matrix, and it can be shown that T is linear.

I'm having trouble finding a matrix representation of T with respect to any basis.
If T can be written as a matrix with respect to a basis, then that matrix applied to the 2 by 2 above would give a 1 by 1 matrix. I don't understand how this can be the case, since you can't multiply a 2 by 2 matrix with any matrix that I know of to get a 1 by 1 matrix as the result.

If I go by the rule that the columns of the matrix are the images of T applied to the basis which you are finding the matrix representation with respect to, then using the basis vectors [1 0; 0 0], [0 1; 0 0], [0 0; 1 0], [0 0; 0 1], which I think are the standard basis vectors for 2 by 2 matrices, I end up with a 1 by 4 matrix of 0s. This doesn't seem right, because I can't multiply a 1 by 4 matrix with a 2 by 2 matrix to get a 1 by 1 matrix.

Can someone please explain to me where I'm going wrong with this?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The matrix will be 1×4, and you won't be multiplying it with any 2×2 matrices, but with a 4×1 matrix.

This should be easy to see if you understand the relationship between linear operators and matrices described in this post.
 
When you represent a linear operator as a matrix, you don't multiply the matrix by the vector, you multiply the matrix by the representation of the vector in Rn.
That is, you can represent the matrix
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}a & b\\ c & d\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

as the column
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}a \\ b \\ c\\ d\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K