Matrix representations of angular momentum operators

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the matrix representations of the angular momentum operators \(\hat{L}_x\), \(\hat{L}_y\), and \(\hat{L}_z\) for a quantum state with \(\ell=1\). The original poster has established the basis states and provided the matrix for \(\hat{L}_z\), but is uncertain about determining the matrices for \(\hat{L}_x\) and \(\hat{L}_y\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest using commutation relations and the properties of the angular momentum operators to derive the matrices. There are mentions of expressing \(\hat{L}_x\) and \(\hat{L}_y\) in terms of raising and lowering operators, with some participants providing specific calculations related to these operators.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring various methods to derive the required matrices. Some have provided calculations for the raising and lowering operators, while others have confirmed that the proposed methods uphold the necessary mathematical identities. However, there is no explicit consensus on a final approach or solution yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of quantum mechanics and the specific properties of angular momentum operators, including the requirement for linear independence of the matrices and adherence to commutation relations.

thecommexokid
Messages
68
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Write down the 3×3 matrices that represent the operators [itex]\hat{L}_x[/itex], [itex]\hat{L}_y[/itex], and [itex]\hat{L}_z[/itex] of angular momentum for a value of [itex]\ell=1[/itex] in a basis which has [itex]\hat{L}_z[/itex] diagonal.

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, so my basis states [itex]\left\{\left|\ell,m\right\rangle\right\}[/itex] are [itex]\left|1,-1\right\rangle[/itex], [itex]\left|1,0\right\rangle[/itex], and [itex]\left|1,1\right\rangle[/itex]. [itex]\hat{L}_z\left|\ell, m\right\rangle=\hbar m\left|\ell,m\right\rangle[/itex], so the matrix representation of [itex]\hat{L}_z[/itex] is easy: [tex]\hat{L}_z \doteq \left( \begin{array}{ccc} -\hbar & & \\ & 0 & \\ & & \hbar \end{array} \right).[/tex] But I don't know what to do in order to determine [itex]\hat{L}_x[/itex] and [itex]\hat{L}_y[/itex].

Homework Equations



The commutation relations [itex]\left[ \hat{L}_x, \hat{L}_y \right] = i\hbar \hat{L}_z[/itex], etc., could maybe be useful but I'm not sure how.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes you should also use the fact that the matrices should be linearly independent (they form a so(3) basis).

The commutation relations give you 3 equations, plus if needed you can use the fact that the sum of the squares must be prorportional to the identity.

You should be able to find them by solving the system of equations.
 
You could express ##\hat{L}_x## and ##\hat{L}_y## in terms of the raising and lowering operators. The matrices for the latter are easy to write down.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
vela said:
You could express ##\hat{L}_x## and ##\hat{L}_y## in terms of the raising and lowering operators. The matrices for the latter are easy to write down.

Thank you so much for your suggestion. Here's my attempt at following it. I know that$$\begin{align*}
\hat L_+\left|1,-1\right\rangle &= \hbar\sqrt{2} \left|1,0\right\rangle \\
\hat L_+\left|1,0\right\rangle &= \hbar\sqrt{2} \left|1,1\right\rangle \\
\hat L_+\left|1,1\right\rangle &= 0
\end{align*}$$ and $$\begin{align*}
\hat L_-\left|1,-1\right\rangle &= 0 \\
\hat L_-\left|1,0\right\rangle &= \hbar\sqrt{2} \left|1,-1\right\rangle \\
\hat L_-\left|1,1\right\rangle &= \hbar\sqrt{2} \left|1,0\right\rangle.
\end{align*}$$
From these statements we can work out that $$\hat L_+\doteq \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
0 & 0 & 0 \\
\hbar\sqrt2 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \hbar\sqrt2& 0
\end{array}\right)$$ and $$\hat L_-\doteq \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
0 & \hbar\sqrt2 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \hbar\sqrt2 \\
0 & 0 & 0
\end{array}\right).$$ I know the raising and lowering operators are defined as $$\begin{align*}
\hat L_+ &= \hat L_x + i\hat L_y \\
\hat L_-&= \hat L_x - i\hat L_y.
\end{align*}$$ So, in reverse, we can say that $$\begin{align*}
\hat L_x &= \tfrac12 \left(\hat L_+ + \hat L_-\right) \doteq \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt2} \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
0 & 1 & 0 \\
1 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & 1 & 0
\end{array}\right)\\
\hat L_y &= \tfrac{1}{2i} \left(\hat L_+ - \hat L_-\right) \doteq \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt2} \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
0 & i & 0 \\
-i & 0 & i \\
0 & -i & 0
\end{array}\right).
\end{align*}$$ As a check, these matrices uphold both the commutation relations and the sum-of-the-squares identity kevinferreira mentioned above.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K