Matrix - Show Using Induction: B^n = 2^(n-1) for (3 -1) (1 1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter gtfitzpatrick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Matrix
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the matrix equation Bn = 2(n-1) for the matrix B = (3 -1; 1 1) using mathematical induction. The base case for n=1 is established, confirming B = 20. The inductive step involves assuming the equation holds for n=k and demonstrating it for n=k+1 by calculating B(k+1) = BkB, leading to the conclusion that the equation holds for all natural numbers n.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical induction
  • Familiarity with matrix multiplication
  • Knowledge of matrix notation and operations
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical induction in depth
  • Learn about matrix exponentiation and its applications
  • Explore advanced matrix properties and theorems
  • Practice problems involving matrix proofs and induction
USEFUL FOR

Students studying linear algebra, mathematicians interested in matrix theory, and educators teaching mathematical induction and matrix operations.

gtfitzpatrick
Messages
372
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



B =
(3 -1)
(1 1)

show using induction B^n = 2^(n-1)
(2+n -n)
(n 2-n)

The Attempt at a Solution


First i prove the base case so let n=1 B=2^0
(3 -1)
(1 1) so it holds true.

then assume it holds true for n=k prove it true for n=k+1
so i sub in and get
b^k+1 = 2^k
(3+k -k-1)
(k+1 1-k)
but I'm not sure where to go from here, thanks for looking! (sorry i don't know how to put in a matrix)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gtfitzpatrick said:
then assume it holds true for n=k prove it true for n=k+1
so i sub in and get
b^k+1 = 2^k
(3+k -k-1)
(k+1 1-k)
but I'm not sure where to go from here, thanks for looking! (sorry i don't know how to put in a matrix)

You seem to be assuming that it is true for n=k+1; but you are supposed to prove that, not assume it.

Instead assume that it is true for n=k:

[tex]\implies B^k=2^{k-1} \begin{pmatrix}2+k & -k \\ k & 2-k\end{pmatrix}[/tex]

Then use the fact that [itex]B^{k+1}=B^kB[/itex] to compute [itex]B^{k+1}[/itex] and show that you get

[tex]2^{(k+1)-1} \begin{pmatrix}2+(k+1) & -(k+1) \\ (k+1) & 2-(k+1)\end{pmatrix}[/tex]
 
yes, when i started to tidy up i got

[tex] 2^{(k-1)} \begin{pmatrix}2k+6) & -2k-2 \\ 2k+2 & -2k+2\end{pmatrix}[/tex]

which further tidies to your equation. this is proved because there is now k+1 where there was k's so it holds true for k+1,k+2...and all values of K...or n.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K