Max error without reference junction

AI Thread Summary
Using a thermocouple as a temperature sensor in a soldering handle, the output is 0 mV at room temperature, and amplification will be done using an AD623. Without a reference junction compensation, the maximum error is uncertain, but it could be significant, potentially around ±1°C, depending on the conditions. The user cannot utilize an ice bath for reference but considers using a table for calculations. To establish a reliable scale, testing the thermocouple in known temperature sources, like boiling and ice water, is recommended. This approach will help determine the accuracy of the readings for regulating temperatures between 160°C and 460°C.
Hammer
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi I'm using thermocuple as a temp. sensor, it is inside soldering handle output is 0 mV (tested with digital voltmeter at range 200 mV) at room temperature.
I'll amplify that voltage using AD623

I cannot use Ice bath to set ref. junction at 0 deg C. I thought using table (ref junction at 0 deg C) and formula to calculate temperature.

My question is what max error without using any compensation will I have.

Will it be actual temp of soldering hand + room temp or will it be low error like +-1 deg C which will suit me (I don't need it to be so precise)?

I will regulate temp automaticly from 160 deg C to 460 deg C
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Your thermocouples output is proportional to temperature change. So put you TC in a know temperatrue source (say boiling water) and note the mV reading. Then put it in another know temperature source (say ice water) and note this mV reading. Now you have your scale.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top