MHB Max Horizontal Displacement of Projectile and its Velocity at T

AI Thread Summary
The equations for the projectile's motion are defined as x = v_0 cos(α_0) t and y = y_0 + v_0 sin(α_0) t - (1/2) gt², where v_0 is the initial speed, α_0 is the launch angle, and g is the acceleration due to gravity. The maximum horizontal displacement of the projectile, when it hits the ground, is given by the formula x_max = v_0² / (g tan(α_0)). At the time T when the projectile reaches the ground, the angle between the initial velocity vector and the velocity vector at T is π/2. Additionally, the optimal launch angle for maximum horizontal range can be calculated as α_0 = arctan(v_0 / √(v_0² + 2gy_0)). This analysis provides essential insights into projectile motion dynamics.
Theia
Messages
121
Reaction score
1
Let $$x = v_0\cos \alpha _0 t$$ and $$y = y_0 + v_0 \sin \alpha _0 t - \tfrac{1}{2} gt^2$$, where

  • $$v_0$$ is speed at time $$t = 0$$,
  • $$\alpha _0$$ is the angle between positive $$x$$-axis and initial velocity vector ($$\alpha _0 \in (0, \pi/2)$$),
  • $$t$$ time in seconds,
  • $$y_0 >0$$ the $$y$$ coordinate at time $$t=0$$,
  • $$g$$ acceleration due the gravity.

Let $$T$$ be the time when the projectile hits positive $$x$$-axis (i.e. the ground). Find the maximum horizontal displacement of the projectile and show that angle between initial velocity vector and velocity vector at time $$T$$ is $$\pi/2$$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
$x_{max} = \dfrac{v_0^2}{g\tan{\alpha_0}}$

(bonus info that can be determined in working this problem) ... the value of $\alpha_0$ that yields a maximum horizontal range is $\alpha_0 = \arctan\left(\dfrac{v_0}{\sqrt{v_0^2 + 2gy_0}}\right)$

let $a = \alpha_0$, initial launch angle (too lazy to type out the Latex)

$b$ = final impact angle at time $T$$T=\dfrac{x}{v_0\cos{a}}$ substitute this expression for $T$ into the equation for $y$. Note $y(T)=0$

$0=y_0 + x\tan{a} - \dfrac{g}{2v_0^2} \cdot x^2\sec^2{a}$

derivative w/respect to $a$ ...

$0 = x\sec^2{a} + \tan{a} \cdot \dfrac{dx}{da} - \dfrac{g}{v_0^2} \left(x^2 \sec^2{a}\tan{a}+x\sec^2{a} \cdot \dfrac{dx}{da} \right)$

when $x$ is a maximum, $\dfrac{dx}{da} = 0$ ...

$0 = x\sec^2{a} - \dfrac{g}{v_0^2} \left(x^2 \sec^2{a}\tan{a}\right)$

$0 = x\sec^2{a}\bigg[1 - \dfrac{g}{v_0^2} \left(x \tan{a}\right) \bigg]$

$x\sec^2{a} \ne 0 \implies x = \dfrac{v_0^2}{g\tan{a}} \implies T = \dfrac{v_0}{g\sin{a}}$

$v_{fx} = v_0\cos{a}$

$v_{fy} = v_0\sin{a} - gT = -v_0 \cdot \dfrac{\cos^2{a}}{\sin{a}}$

$\tan{b} = \dfrac{v_{fy}}{v_{fx}} = -\cot{a}$

$\tan{b} \cdot \tan{a} = -\cot{a} \cdot \tan{a} = -1 \implies a \perp b$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for your solution! ^^
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top